Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is an injustice that the media is attacked for trying to keep citizens informed, their arrest can mean and expose the bad government that is being run in the country.
So why did those unionized democrat voting police officers arrest them? Who gave them the order? It looked like a stunt to make it look like the media is being silenced. That's how it certainly looks to other nations trying to figure out just what the heck is going on in the USA.
He may say that, but who's going to be held accountable? What example is going to be set in order to dissuade others from doing the same in the future? Or will a simple apology be the price of violating peoples' rights?
Status:
"Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge."
(set 2 days ago)
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,599,675 times
Reputation: 5697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake
Funny how THAT's unacceptable, but looting, vandalizing and burning homes and businesses seems to be perfectly acceptable.
"looting, vandalizing and burning homes and businesses" are not protected by the First Amendment, especially if the reporter were just sitting there doing his job. You're a conservative, presumably all about our Constitution and about law and order - surely you can pick up on that much.
That verbal shield of yours wouldn't deflect a spitball. QED.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.