Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2020, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Behind two gates and a nice wall
860 posts, read 321,051 times
Reputation: 651

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
Is he still popping them like candy?
You can be better than this little trump. Why keep evading the main issue here? The issue that the media/left were so anxious to publish something that would contradict a republican that they never took the time to verify the info properly. They pimped it ASAP, rather than doing their due diligence in an unbiased way. And now that we know yet another left wing scientific study was faked, just like the global warming one, the media is not highlighting it the way they did the false study to begin with.

Even you must be able to see how biased the media/left are when it comes to anything that might have a chance to make a republican look bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2020, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,833 posts, read 17,076,416 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
By your own admission, it only works in some cases and, again by your own admission, all it does is alleviate symptoms.

It is neither preventative nor curative.

The are other safer drugs that can alleviate the symptoms, and without the side-effects or harm it causes.



Then by your own admission, your understanding is on a par with a paper plate.

"Peer-reviewed" does not mean "replicated."

"Peer-reviewed" means a group of qualified persons reviewed the methodology to determine if it was sound and conducted under scientific standards; another group of qualified persons reviewed the data to ensure no mathematical errors; and another group of qualified persons examined ethical considerations.

That's all it means.
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Horse****.

If you truly value scientific principles then you would realize such a conclusion cannot be reached in a general sense without rigorous clinical trials. If you are not able to link to such evidence proving your claim, then your anecdotal conclusions resulting only from your singular perspective are completely lacking in reliability.
So say you. I can guarantee you the hundreds of patients whose lives were saved due to the prescription of these medications would laugh you off the stage.

In a health crisis reliable is not a word we use frequently. Life is to precious to only want something "reliable".

Let me tell you a true story so that you can get your head on straight and help you understand that your rather miserly vision of drug treatment is not the way things happen. Perhaps at your desk you look for that type of data...We look for results often hour to hour minute to minute.

We had several patients present to the ER with symptoms of CoVid 19. The tests to determine positive or negative were useless so as a team we decided to dose them with Hydroxy, zinc, vitamin C and Zithromax.
We based our decisions upon anecdotal results (just those type of results which you disparage) and low and behold after 2-3 days they were better. Not just better but clinically substantially improved. Reduced fever, lung fields improved overall, off oxygen and more variables...all improved.

So in our world, where lives are on the line, we base our decisions upon the tried and true experiences of other medical professionals who are sworn to tell others what they've found.

So now you can relax in your barcalounger with your studies all you want and continue to criticize those of us who actually know what we are talking about and have the creditability to back it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2020, 02:34 PM
 
20,758 posts, read 8,536,468 times
Reputation: 14377
A key Twitter comment by:

Michael Levitt, Stanford Prof. of Biophysics, Cambridge PhD and DSc, 2013 Chemistry Nobel Laureate (complex systems), FRS & US National Academy member. Said "totally shocking".

"My faith in the peer-review system is shattered after 50 years & over 200 papers in high-profile journals. "


I've known about the corrupt peer-review system and FDA for years after reading Overdo$ed America by John Abramson MD. Get a used copy for pennies on Amazon or from your library. It describes the approval process for BigPharma drugs. Always follow the money, folks.

https://www.amazon.com/Overdosed-Ame...s=books&sr=1-1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2020, 05:30 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,866 posts, read 46,568,263 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
Not me sir.

Why politically censor?
Why politically ban?
Why politically lie?

What is the end game?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top