Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We are supposed to believe the former MI6 agent about the coronavirus but we are not supposed to believe the former MI6 agent who wrote the Trump dossier?
We are supposed to believe the former MI6 agent about the coronavirus but we are not supposed to believe the former MI6 agent who wrote the Trump dossier?
We are supposed to believe the former MI6 agent about the coronavirus but we are not supposed to believe the former MI6 agent who wrote the Trump dossier?
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 2 days ago)
35,592 posts, read 17,927,273 times
Reputation: 50626
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1
Researchers have been saying that for months, but Masterful_Man is correct - was the release intentional or accidental?
Initially I was convinced it was an accident. Now, I'm not so sure.
Well, it doesn't seem that if it was a purposeful release, the lab would release it right there in their own community.
If it was a purposeful release, it seems it would have been done in cities that are enemies of the original lab where it appeared to have been created.
I’m telling you, this was a conspiracy between the globalists, China and our wonderful Democrats to try to take Trump down and reverse Brexit.
Wow. Thanks I needed a laugh. Just a bit of critique. You failed to mention Qanon and Soros. So I will need to deduct some style points. Plus you could have tried to link in the Clinton foundation for some degree of difficulty points. But you show promise.
So Christopher Steele is an unreliable source but Sir Dearlove is reliable?
Even though Sir Dearlove has no background in medicine or virology?
why would he be unreliable?
your premise is idiotic. it’s like saying that if you don’t consider one single member of a given group to be reliable, you have to distrust every other member of that group, without evidence.
seems pretty stupid to me.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
