Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-09-2020, 10:41 PM
 
9,446 posts, read 6,571,033 times
Reputation: 18898

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by happly retired View Post
you are worried about 115 civilians in some hell hole and not worried about the 90 cops killed so far this year in america?

Who said that? They aren't mutually exclusive you know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2020, 07:31 AM
 
295 posts, read 143,407 times
Reputation: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by kajo13 View Post
So you're saying people are incapable of caring about more than one atrocity? Well, that sure explains a lot about Trumpers.
no the op clearly was talking about all the deaths in another country and did not mention one word about the killings here

nice try
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 07:37 AM
 
1,066 posts, read 628,914 times
Reputation: 1297
Not a big deal. Collateral, better them then us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 07:39 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
11,027 posts, read 6,501,184 times
Reputation: 13259
It’s called war for a reason, and war is hell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 07:40 AM
 
45,203 posts, read 26,414,151 times
Reputation: 24961
Quote:
Originally Posted by kajo13 View Post
Not true. A lot of us (major Obama supporters)were disgusted that Obama authorized these types of strikes. I expected more from him and tried to let him know.
And probably voted for him a second time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 07:41 AM
 
45,203 posts, read 26,414,151 times
Reputation: 24961
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomPenguin View Post
Not a big deal. Collateral, better them then us.
Because those children posed a threat?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX Wahine View Post
It’s called war for a reason, and war is hell.
So you'd accept that explanation if your house were bombed and children killed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 07:45 AM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,087,610 times
Reputation: 9726
Meanwhile Trump's "peace plan" with the Taliban is a failure:




The U.N. exposes the limits of the Trump peace plan with the Taliban

Contrary to the Trump administration’s peace plan with the Taliban, al-Qaida is more embedded in the Afghan Taliban than ever. The Taliban have not renounced their alliance with al-Qaida. The maintenance of the alliance also raises disturbing questions about Pakistan’s role in sponsoring the Taliban war against the United States and NATO
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order...h-the-taliban/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 07:47 AM
 
13,602 posts, read 4,925,272 times
Reputation: 9687
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbenson View Post
The U.S. dropped 7,423 bombs on Afghanistan in 2019, Children Killed

One hundred and fifteen civilians died in just 10 airstrikes in the U.S. war in Afghanistan in the last two years; more than 70 of them were children



President Trump would like to declare that he has brought back all American troops in Afghanistan before the US presidential election on 3 November. He tweeted on Wednesday: “Bring our soldiers back home but closely watch what is going on and strike with a thunder like never before, if necessary.” The Pentagon is none too happy about this, but keeping US troops in the country for a few more months, after almost two decades of failure, is not going to make much difference.


The U.S. military has dropped tens of thousands of bombs on Afghanistan since it began occupying the country in 2001. This violence has escalated rather than decreased even with the official “end” of the combat mission there in 2014, with the number of munitions dropped on the country hitting an annual record of 7,423 last year.

While the Pentagon states that it does everything in its power to avoid killing and wounding innocent people, it affords scant resources to investigate the actual impact of its strikes. It does not actually track down the victims of airstrikes, relying on its own intelligence and refusing to visit the sites of its strikes or interview eyewitnesses. The grueling work of investigating who these strikes are actually killing and maiming has thus been left to nongovernmental organizations and journalists. The reality they uncover has usually been much uglier than official U.S. government accounts suggest.

After nearly two decades of inconclusive fighting, the United States appears to be preparing to exit Afghanistan. Rather than defeating the Taliban, the U.S. government is putting the final touches on a peace agreement with the group that will allow for a U.S. military withdrawal, but makes few guarantees for peace between the militants and the Afghan central government that was set up during the occupation. Since 2001 the war has killed over 2,300 U.S. service members. No one is sure how many Afghans have died, but even the most conservative estimates put the figure above 100,000 — not counting the many more who have been maimed or driven from their homes by the fighting.
Thanks for posting this. With everyone focused on Covid-19 and George Floyd, it is easy to forget that we still have military operations underway in various parts of the world. We should rightly be asking: what are we doing there and why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 07:48 AM
 
2,400 posts, read 754,227 times
Reputation: 1857
We got a lot more. I read we still have some 500lbs bombs from the Vietnam era. Cheaper to drop them on our enemies than dispose them!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2020, 07:49 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
11,027 posts, read 6,501,184 times
Reputation: 13259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
So you'd accept that explanation if your house were bombed and children killed?
If my city was dumb enough to hide terrorists among it’s civilians and I was dumb enough to remain there and we were subsequently getting bombed then I would have to deal with those consequences just like everyone else does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top