Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You only think that because you agree with this ruling. What happens if a bunch of conservative get on there? I have long said those appointments ought to be limited to 20 years, ruling I agree with or not.
However, what in the crap kind of information does someone have on Roberts? Seriously, some of the stuff he has been ruling on recently seem to go against his own past rulings.
No, I like that because it takes politics out of it as much as is possible. But even if it was only because I liked the ruling, that's an infinity better take on it than yet another imagined conspiracy theory.
Kind of like Eisenhower appointing Earl Warren, the Republican Governor of California, hoping he'd be a conservative voice and then gets Brown vs. the Board of Education. Surprise, surprise!
They just said Trump didn’t give a good enough reason. Trump should just reach out to Justice Roberts and they should work on what a good enough reason would be.
...this is just going to increase the flow of children that are coming into the United States unlawfully. This is giving a license for people to keep smuggling children. It's saying if you're a child, immigration laws don't matter. Bring your whole family.
This will be abused, and worsen the problem of illegal immigration.
You only think that because you agree with this ruling. What happens if a bunch of conservative get on there? I have long said those appointments ought to be limited to 20 years, ruling I agree with or not.
However, what in the crap kind of information does someone have on Roberts? Seriously, some of the stuff he has been ruling on recently seem to go against his own past rulings.
The problem is wild swings then. I would like to see some sort of system that assures a max 6-3 swing either way. I do not know how such a system would work.
I just listened to the news story on NBC. This ruling ONLY addresses the manner in which DACA was shut down, nothing more....
Yes, I heard that the Trump Administration memo on the matter did not provide adequate reasoning to the Court behind the request for rescinding DACA. I think DACA will be back before SCOTUS in a couple more years based on more detailed documentation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
DACA stays, per SCOTUS
