Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2020, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Eureka CA
9,519 posts, read 14,699,255 times
Reputation: 15067

Advertisements

Stupid post. Not gonna happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-18-2020, 12:22 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,497,754 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Never happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2020, 12:23 PM
 
62,726 posts, read 28,935,937 times
Reputation: 18486
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkm370 View Post
Trump voters got scammed again. No Conservative SCOTUS, no wall, no jobs coming back, nothing.
No conservative SC Justices? WTH are you talking about? One just got appointed recently. What do you mean no wall? It is being built as we speak. We had the lowest unemployment while Trump has been in office. Do you just make up lies as you go along?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2020, 12:25 PM
 
62,726 posts, read 28,935,937 times
Reputation: 18486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tritone View Post
Stop calling them "kids". The average age of DACA recipients is 30+. That's very dishonest.

These are people who arrived when they were kids. They're not kids now. They can take their grown asses back to their country of origin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2020, 12:29 PM
bu2
 
23,965 posts, read 14,760,934 times
Reputation: 12780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
No conservative SC Justices? WTH are you talking about? One just got appointed recently. What do you mean no wall? It is being built as we speak. We had the lowest unemployment while Trump has been in office. Do you just make up lies as you go along?
OP is a seriously "glass half-empty" type of person. Actually it sounds like he can only see half the glass. W. a liberal!!!!! Must think HW was a flaming communist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2020, 12:37 PM
 
51,617 posts, read 25,681,640 times
Reputation: 37801
Impeach Roberts for lying to Congress? Too funny.

Roberts knows which way the wind is blowing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2020, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Corona del Mar, CA - Coronado, CA
4,477 posts, read 3,282,719 times
Reputation: 5609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro5 View Post
Which cases? The SC cannot make laws. They can only give interpretations and opinions.
One instance would be King v Burwell. When the ACA was passed by Congress it established that the federal government could reimburse expenses for medical care to state exchanges. However not every state chose to set up state exchanges, so the Executive branch created a federal exchange and authorized spending money in a way NOT authorized by Congress.

In King v Burwell Roberts literally had to rewrite the ACA to say that the federal government COULD spend money in a way NOT authorized by Congress. The proper remedy would have been to return the case to Congress to fix the oversight, but since the Congress had changed, very much due to the ACA, Roberts knew that the new Congress would not pass a new law, he wrote it.

Completely wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Threerun View Post
Looks like someones bottom is sore today. Got a little spanking? All about kids raised in the USA? Try some ice.
All about the rule of law and each branch of government fulfilling their proper roles. The original DACA EO is illegal. That is what the Court should have ruled on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tillman7 View Post
Chief Justice John Roberts did the right thing. Roberts is a honorable man.
I think you mean you think the outcome was right, whether or not the original EO was legal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
Why, because he didn't agree with you on something? Oh, waaahhhhh.
Because Roberts allowed an illegal EO to stand while setting aside the remedy to the illegal EO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
How is that perjury, exactly?
If you tell Congress one thing, then do another, you have lied, or in legal parlance, you have committed perjury.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
Methinks you don't understand how the separation of powers and judicial review work. Time to brush up on Civics 101.
That is a very bizarre statement given that the original EO that President Trump reversed was an illegal intrusion into Congress's law making powers as regards immigration. Especially that Obama claimed for years he could not do what he eventually did.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VA Yankee View Post
Sounds like Chief Justice Roberts is doing his job as he sees fit not he current incumbent in office that's why they are appointed not elected. If Congress wants to make law then let them do their job and stop landing it at the Steps of the Courthouse because you may not like the outcome.
Congress DID make the law in Title VII of the CRA and the SCOTUS rewrote the law.

It is Congress's prerogative to make or NOT make laws. Neither the Executive nor the SCOTUS is free to act and encroach on Congress's law making and appropriation powers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
He just lead a ruling based upon FEELINGS and not the Law of the Land.
Say bye-bye to the nations sovereignty for a one world government.
Scary, isn't it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCbaxter View Post
This thread is hilarious. At the end of the day it will trump, stephen miller and a half a dozen of you guys sitting in a bunker doing maga chants.
I didn't vote for President Trump in 2016.

I like branches of government that stay in their own lane. The Constitution lays out those roles and responsibilities. I don't think it is asking too much that each branch do their job and leave the other branches to theirs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2020, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Nowhere
10,098 posts, read 4,063,487 times
Reputation: 7086
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
OP is a seriously "glass half-empty" type of person. Actually it sounds like he can only see half the glass. W. a liberal!!!!! Must think HW was a flaming communist.
Reagan signed off on "legalizing" with a stroke of a pen millions of border jumpers.


With that in mind, when is the last time a TRUE conservative was in the White House? I honestly don't know. I think Ford was okay, but his appointment of John Paul Stevens had terrible consequences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2020, 01:12 PM
 
2,643 posts, read 2,437,802 times
Reputation: 1928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavalier View Post
Roberts was a Bush appointment. Bush was a liberal. Educate yourself: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...rticle1086586/



It all makes so much sense now that Bill Kristol was breathing down his neck with his fangs, chuckling the whole time.
Your in a cult that alienates everyone. Apparently everyone is a liberal or deep state or whatever conspiracy theroy nonsense you guys have cooked up for the week. Roberts votes GOP 95% of the time but now hes a "liberal deep state" because the Trump administration didnt follow proper procedure on eliminating DACA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2020, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Nowhere
10,098 posts, read 4,063,487 times
Reputation: 7086
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkm370 View Post
Your in a cult that alienates everyone. Apparently everyone is a liberal or deep state or whatever conspiracy theroy nonsense you guys have cooked up for the week. Roberts votes GOP 95% of the time but now hes a "liberal deep state" because the Trump administration didnt follow proper procedure on eliminating DACA.
Bush was surrounded by far-left liberals. And the article points out how he was actually a liberal. Guy was a pure anti-American scum bag. Bill Kristol had more power over the world with Bush in office than Bush did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top