Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Our notion of right or left is not very relevant when looking at Hitler -- or other despotic tyrants. They move from one whim to another with little concern for ideology. That's why Trump is hard to classify. The Fascists: Hitler, Franco, Trump, and Mussolini, were (are) not opposed to change as long as it goes along with their self-indulgent plans. In today's understanding they would be rightists. Fascism is a perverted alliance of government, corporations & industries, and religion for the concentration of power and wealth among elites. That doesn't equate well with lefties.
Again, the very fact that you guys keep going back to that ONE case from years ago proves how much in the fringe those people are. You’d think if there was really widespread Antisemitism on the right, you’d have dozens of these marches to call out.
On the other hand, you have members of Congress - Democrats - who were so fearful of antagonizing their anti-Jew base that they refused to issue a resolution condemning antisemitism!
A) Antisemitism on the right: a small band of neo-Nazi misfits from five years ago who have no power and no influence
B) Antisemitism on the left: Congressional Democrats unwilling to renounce antisemitism, and instead having to water down a resolution to the point that Omar called it a resolution condemning Islamaphobia
What do you have to say abouttrump calling henry ford as having “good bloodlines” ? Did he just butter up because he was a in ford facility?
Again, the very fact that you guys keep going back to that ONE case from years ago proves how much in the fringe those people are. You’d think if there was really widespread Antisemitism on the right, you’d have dozens of these marches to call out.
On the other hand, you have members of Congress - Democrats - who were so fearful of antagonizing their anti-Jew base that they refused to issue a resolution condemning antisemitism!
A) Antisemitism on the right: a small band of neo-Nazi misfits from five years ago who have no power and no influence
B) Antisemitism on the left: Congressional Democrats unwilling to renounce antisemitism, and instead having to water down a resolution to the point that Omar called it a resolution condemning Islamaphobia
As if talib and that somalian are the most powerful women in earth. Are youjustmad because they are muslims?
- Believed "his people" were being oppressed/victimized by another race/ethnic group
- Believed in using government to direct violence to achieve his objectives/ correct self perceived social injustices
- Believed in using concentration camps (like the ones the Bernie Bros wanted?) to eliminate "undesirables" (deplorables?) from the population
- Believed in wealth confiscation to correct self perceived social injustices
- Was a registered socialist at least at some point (Nazi stands for National Socialist German Workers Party)
- Wanted to wipe Russia off the map...
- And of course, he was a raging antisemite.
Where would Hitler fit in today's political paradigm?
One of several of the leftist lies is to claim that Hitler and other maniacal maniacs was borne of the right wing. He wouldn't agree with that, nor does anyone who understands the dynamics of totalitarian/dictatorial socialists.
The Nazi's were socialists, as were Mussolini's followers.
Yet when you have liberals/leftists controlling the media and much of the school system, they will twist history to protect their own ideology, and demonize the other. They have done the same thing with American history, trying to scrub their responsibility for slavery, segregation and inhuman treatment of black people.
You have to love how every one of the portraits of Speakers of the House that Pelosi is going to remove was a Democrat.
Of course that only helps to scrub the Democrats involvement.
Maybe it is time for a re branding of the Democratic party, since they want to deny history and tear down all vestiges of their ugly past.
To be called a Democrat in this current environment (of tearing down anything associated with slavery) should mean tearing down the very name of the party responsible for it all, the Democrat Party itself!
- Believed "his people" were being oppressed/victimized by another race/ethnic group
- Believed in using government to direct violence to achieve his objectives/ correct self perceived social injustices
- Believed in using concentration camps (like the ones the Bernie Bros wanted?) to eliminate "undesirables" (deplorables?) from the population
- Believed in wealth confiscation to correct self perceived social injustices
- Was a registered socialist at least at some point (Nazi stands for National Socialist German Workers Party)
- Wanted to wipe Russia off the map...
- And of course, he was a raging antisemite.
Where would Hitler fit in today's political paradigm?
Our Democrat/Socialists are no different than the Nationalist Socialists of Hitler days. THey even have their Brown Shirt mob (ANTIFA and BLM) tearing down monuments they don't like and getting public official to bow to them through violence
Our Democrat/Socialists are no different than the Nationalist Socialists of Hitler days. THey even have their Brown Shirt mob (ANTIFA and BLM) tearing down monuments they don't like and getting public official to bow to them through violence
And more than 95% of the Media is the Democrat Ministry of Propaganda.
One of several of the leftist lies is to claim that Hitler and other maniacal maniacs was borne of the right wing. He wouldn't agree with that, nor does anyone who understands the dynamics of totalitarian/dictatorial socialists.
The Nazi's were socialists, as were Mussolini's followers.
Yet when you have liberals/leftists controlling the media and much of the school system, they will twist history to protect their own ideology, and demonize the other. They have done the same thing with American history, trying to scrub their responsibility for slavery, segregation and inhuman treatment of black people.
You have to love how every one of the portraits of Speakers of the House that Pelosi is going to remove was a Democrat.
Of course that only helps to scrub the Democrats involvement.
Maybe it is time for a re branding of the Democratic party, since they want to deny history and tear down all vestiges of their ugly past.
To be called a Democrat in this current environment (of tearing down anything associated with slavery) should mean tearing down the very name of the party responsible for it all, the Democrat Party itself!
`
The Nazi's were not socialists !!!! And I don't care that Socialist was in the party's own name. Is the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea -- either democratic or a republic? NO.
They hated Communists, and they hated Socialists. in addition to hating about 6 or 7 other groups of people, the Jews being # 1 on that list. Hitler and Mussolini obtained power by being a "third way" to govern --- anti democratic, and also violently anti communist and anti-socialist. These guys were extreme right nationalists.
One of several of the leftist lies is to claim that Hitler and other maniacal maniacs was borne of the right wing. He wouldn't agree with that, nor does anyone who understands the dynamics of totalitarian/dictatorial socialists.
The Nazi's were socialists, as were Mussolini's followers.
Yet when you have liberals/leftists controlling the media and much of the school system, they will twist history to protect their own ideology, and demonize the other. They have done the same thing with American history, trying to scrub their responsibility for slavery, segregation and inhuman treatment of black people.
You have to love how every one of the portraits of Speakers of the House that Pelosi is going to remove was a Democrat.
Of course that only helps to scrub the Democrats involvement.
Maybe it is time for a re branding of the Democratic party, since they want to deny history and tear down all vestiges of their ugly past.
To be called a Democrat in this current environment (of tearing down anything associated with slavery) should mean tearing down the very name of the party responsible for it all, the Democrat Party itself!
`
I’d actually like to see the Democrat Party break off into two: the first can be comprised of the radical left and the America haters like OAC and Omar and DeBlasio, and the second can be made of up of moderate Democrats like....uhh.....uhh.....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
