Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2020, 05:14 AM
 
Location: Virginia
10,093 posts, read 6,433,756 times
Reputation: 27660

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
People are allowed to ask you questions in public. .
And you are allowed to refuse to answer them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2020, 05:47 AM
 
Location: Grovetown, Ga
109 posts, read 78,717 times
Reputation: 602
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
If he would've stopped and talked to them nothing would've happened. Instead he kept running just as a burglar might do, so they kept in pursuit. I viewed the video. Arbery made a 90 degree turn ran right at McMichaels, grabbing the gun and was punching him in the head. No one forced him to do that. What else was McMichaels supposed to do give Arbery his gun and he get shot? Arbery was completely shot in self defense.
Perhaps they could have followed him at a safe distance and called 911. He was jogging on a public road and they were in trucks. If they were concerned about a possible crime or the jogger having a gun, wouldn't it be prudent to call the police? The truth is they weren't out to "talk" to him they were vigilantes on a hunt and he was a black man in their neighborhood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2020, 06:06 AM
 
2,323 posts, read 1,561,709 times
Reputation: 2311
Lol, this guy mtl1. This guy isn't factoring in all of what the GBI has put together prior and is just holding on to his initial thoughts of looking at the video. What's it called when you willfully ignore things again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2020, 06:39 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by goingstrong View Post
Perhaps they could have followed him at a safe distance and called 911. He was jogging on a public road and they were in trucks. If they were concerned about a possible crime or the jogger having a gun, wouldn't it be prudent to call the police? The truth is they weren't out to "talk" to him they were vigilantes on a hunt and he was a black man in their neighborhood.
Bingo.

Their "citizen's arrest" BS is feeble.

However, if they get a jury of their peers, they'll likely get off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2020, 06:55 AM
 
6,393 posts, read 4,115,163 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
That narrative defies all plausibility. All they wanted to do is was stop and question him and wait till the police got there. How do you box someone in driving on a residential street when the person can run in any direction? You would have to chase and catch them on foot like police have to do all the time when the suspect runs. This is some serious gaslighting going on.
Arbery didn't know that. He hadn't done anything wrong and was out jogging and checking out a construction site, which many people do on a regular basis. Bryan even admitted that he hit Arbery with his truck at least once and another time almost ran over him. Arbery had to jump into a ditch to avoid getting run over.

Georgia law doesn't allow regular citizens to give chase to someone they never witnessed committing a crime. All 3 mofos have admitted to the GBI that they never saw Arbery commit anything.

You're really bending over backward to try to justify this lynch mob.

Edit.

The truck hit Arbery hard enough to put a dent on the truck. Think about that. Try to put a dent on a truck with only your person. It's hard.

Think of the physical and mental stress these rednecks put Arbery through chasing him around, cutting him off, hitting him, made him jump into a ditch to avoid getting hit again, etc. Of course at the end Arbery turned toward the gun totting redneck. Arbery was fighting for his life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2020, 06:56 AM
 
6,393 posts, read 4,115,163 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevalier de saint-george View Post
lol, this guy mtl1. This guy isn't factoring in all of what the gbi has put together prior and is just holding on to his initial thoughts of looking at the video. What's it called when you willfully ignore things again?
LA LA LA I can't hear you LA LA LA!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2020, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,284 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15643
Quote:
Originally Posted by k350 View Post
Sounds plausible. neighbor could have said they just saw this guy breaking into a house, help us get him, and the neighbor blindly went along with it.

As for me, I would have just called the police and stayed out of the whole ordeal.

I think he was a participant, but based off of incorrect information, and certainly not a party to the killing, from the evidence I seen anyway.
Most would have just called police as you indicated I would never chase someone down based on a hunch particularly when he wasn't carrying any stolen articles. If it turns out that he was involved in cutting off Arbery he could be convicted, I don't see his participation any different than McMichael's son.
Why not just use your cell phone camera and let the authorities settle this later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2020, 07:05 AM
 
6,393 posts, read 4,115,163 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Most would have just called police as you indicated I would never chase someone down based on a hunch. If it turns out that he was involved in cutting off Arbery he could be convicted, I don't see his participation any different than McMichael's son.
There's no "If" in this. The original police report clearly stated Bryan was involved chasing Arbery and trying to box him in. Bryan admitted to hitting Arbery with his truck. There's a dent on his truck with Arbery's shirt fiber on it. In the original police report, the McMichaels even called Bryan by his nickname and said he helped them chase Arbery down.

It wasn't until the McMichaels were arrested that Bryan and his lawyer started creating a new narrative, that Bryan was just a bystander in all this.

Remember that for 2 months, the local PD maintained that Arbery was killed during a robbery (by Arbery). So, for 2 months they saw themselves as heros.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2020, 07:08 AM
 
Location: South of Heaven
7,926 posts, read 3,469,281 times
Reputation: 11596
Quote:
Originally Posted by goingstrong View Post
Perhaps they could have followed him at a safe distance and called 911. He was jogging on a public road and they were in trucks. If they were concerned about a possible crime or the jogger having a gun, wouldn't it be prudent to call the police? The truth is they weren't out to "talk" to him they were vigilantes on a hunt and he was a black man in their neighborhood.
I can't believe people are still pushing the "jogger" narrative. LOL Hey never give an inch right? Conservatives could learn from such steadfastness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2020, 07:41 AM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,440,773 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
That narrative defies all plausibility. All they wanted to do is was stop and question him and wait till the police got there. How do you box someone in driving on a residential street when the person can run in any direction? You would have to chase and catch them on foot like police have to do all the time when the suspect runs. This is some serious gaslighting going on.
Much was made of this point in the first thread on this incident.

And yet, not one single person brought any of this up in the preliminary hearing.

Guessing because it has no relevance to anything. Arberry had a right to be on the road. He was under no obligation to run onto private property either to try to escape them or to seek help which he may or may not have found.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top