Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do Africans make more money, look great, produce blockbusting movies, show off their luxuries and make sure to taunt others with their glorious wealth every day? Really, what do white Europeans NOT have when it comes to Africans?
So, whites in America 200 years ago should be held accountable for buying slaves, but blacks in Africa shouldn't be held accountable for selling slaves 200 years ago.
That makes zero sense. It took both parties for slavery to happen.
Agreed. It's as stupid to blame today's black Africans for what happened 200 years ago as it is white Americans.
The bigger issue is that no one thinks they can shake down African taxpayers for the "sins" of their ancestors. Their leadership isn't as stupid as some in this country.
Do Africans make more money, look great, produce blockbusting movies, show off their luxuries and make sure to taunt others with their glorious wealth every day? Really, what do white Europeans NOT have when it comes to Africans?
So, whites in America 200 years ago should be held accountable for buying slaves, but blacks in Africa shouldn't be held accountable for selling slaves 200 years ago.
That makes zero sense. It took both parties for slavery to happen.
oh, you were waiting with baited breath for that response, weren't you?
while I agree that nobody alive today should be responsible for the events of 2-300 years ago, the logic falls flat here in that blacks were mistreated up until about 50 years ago.
since then, there have been isolated cases of racism that should be dealt with on an individual basis - not a nation bearing the brunt of it in the form of monuments being torn down and private businesses being burned and looted.
Location: Somewhere between the Americas and Western Europe
2,180 posts, read 640,204 times
Reputation: 2092
Quote:
Originally Posted by aileesic
Do Africans make more money, look great, produce blockbusting movies, show off their luxuries and make sure to taunt others with their glorious wealth every day? Really, what do white Europeans NOT have when it comes to Africans?
So you're mad that the Africans who were involved in the slave trade did nothing but squander their wealth?
Take it up with the Africans.
The Europeans built empires and long lasting institutions and systems of government and business that benefitted their own people (and then really, the whole world).
Africans and Arabs had a SEVERAL hundred year head-start in the slave trade. The Arabs built empires and wealth, and the Africans? Well, Mansa Musa was the richest man in history, and he STILL didn't build a legacy for his people.
Africa was conquered by the Arabs in the north and then the Europeans in the south because despite all that wealth, the Africans pissed it away.
Don't be mad at white people. Be mad - "big mad," as you say - at your ancestors. You know, the ones who brought your granddaddy to the slave market to be picked up by foreigners. Be even BIGGER MAD that your ancestors were probably the only people in history who SOLD THEIR OWN PEOPLE into slavery, willingly.
I mean, damn, throughout history slaves were usually captured against their will and raided in war and battles. But Jesus.... those ole' African kings and chiefs willingly sold y'all at the TRADING POST!!
Your anger is misguided. And the only reason why you turn a historical blind eye is because Africa and Africans remain comparatively poor and your shakedown wouldn't work.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.