Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Since they're sworn to uphold the Constitution "so help them God" then hopefully they can be thrown out of office for violating their oaths. I'd love to see them thrown in prison, barring that (no pun intended) they should pay full restitution out of their own pockets. At the very least sued for everything that they own and then some.
It's that god part that I just don't understand why people babble that?
If that's accurate, walking down Portland Place doesn't make much sense because Lake Ave doesn't go through to the north. Looking at satellite pics, there might be an alley in between 33 and 35 Portland Pl, but it could be a driveway or something else, too.
the property was broken into, the protesters were threatening them and their dog, and a few of the protesters had guns.....they broke thru the fence and the property was signs, "no trespassing, privet property" The couple were on their own property. If someone threatened my life, I would certainly deem that I needed to protect myself.
Can you prove that the mob was unarmed? Remember, the McCloskeys are the defendants here. If the McClosekys get charged for anything and go to trial, the DA (or the state) is the one who will provide evidence that the mob was unarmed and peaceful.
Can you prove that the mob was unarmed? Remember, the McCloskeys are the defendants here. If the McClosekys get charged for anything and go to trial, the DA (or the state) is the one who will provide evidence that the mob was unarmed and peaceful.
Why on earth do you think that would be an issue? You think there is some law about carrying when in a group? The issue is the couple pointing weapons at people passing by.
Can you prove that the mob was unarmed? Remember, the McCloskeys are the defendants here. If the McClosekys get charged for anything and go to trial, the DA (or the state) is the one who will provide evidence that the mob was unarmed and peaceful.
I saw a picture of someone standing in front of the couple with a rifle or shot gun of sorts, not sure what it was,,,,,,
Why on earth do you keep raising this untrue item. There is a very clear video of the protesters entering the tract through an open and apparently undamaged gate.
Uh, claims by the probable defendants, or their legal representation, is not evidence.
The gate was broken at some point, yes. There is video that shows the gate was not apparently broken prior to the confrontation with the homeowners, the gate was demonstrably not as damaged at that time.
Why on earth do you think that would be an issue? You think there is some law about carrying when in a group? The issue is the couple pointing weapons at people passing by.
Circumstantial evidence vs direct evidence
Circumstantial evidence that the mob had the potential for violence
1) the gate was broken
2) St Louis was under civil unrest, looting, and violence (one retired St Louis police captain was shot dead on the street) for 2 weeks straight before the mob trespassed on McCloskeys private community on June 28
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
