Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I subscribed to the NY Times for many years. It used to be a great paper. They were always liberal, but they used to know where the line was drawn between news and editorials. It is such a shame what has happened to it. These days, the news articles are completely tainted too. It has become unreadable.
This is no surprise that this has happened. That is what the left does, right? No room for any views that deviate from the narrative.
I subscribes to the NY Times for many years. It used to be a great paper. They were always liberal, but they used to know where the line was drawn between news and editorials. It is such a shame what has happened to it. These days, the news articles are completely tainted too. It has become unreadable.
This is no surprise that this has happened. That is what the left does, right? No room for any views that deviate from the narrative.
This is true, but up until recently it was at least tolerable. The Washington Post, on the other hand has been a nasty cesspool for a long time now. And it's bizarre, because this is what Jeff Bezos wanted and so many years later, the Marxist mob he encouraged is coming for his head as a successful billionaire. They want his head on a stick, all that pandering to the mob has earned him ZERO good will
DO NOT ENCOURAGE THE MOB, they WILL eventually come for YOU
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 8 days ago)
35,630 posts, read 17,968,125 times
Reputation: 50655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody01
How do you know? CNN and MSNBC claim to be non biased and factual too......just saying.....
I don't see them as unbiased, just by watching them.
Do you?
Do you not feel, in general, that you can tell when you're reading a biased article, just by the very way it's worded?
And do you not feel that you can strongly sense when something isn't true?
Like the thread currently on here, mayors vote to pay reparations of 6.2 quadrillion dollars. Do you, like most people, immediately know that's not true?
I think most of us have a sense for what's true, and what's slanted.
The NY Times is run by the leftist mob. It's nothing but an agitprop rag. And who's surprised that this Jewish woman was subjected to a toxic amount of Anti-Semitism on the job in that building?
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 8 days ago)
35,630 posts, read 17,968,125 times
Reputation: 50655
BlakeJones, this is really upsetting to you - and I just now read your location.
How do your fellow New Yorkers feel about this?
As I understand this, they didn't fire her, she resigned? Because she was working in a hostile environment?
But she purposely took the job as a voice of opposition to the others on staff. I would guess that most high-profile professional journalists are pretty outspoken and opinionated, and she was around outspoken opinionated people who saw things completely differently than she does, and she purposely took the job and knew she would be in that position.
Am I reading this wrong?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.