Isn't President Trump obligated..... (Congress, election, vs, elect)

[Roadking2003]

Originally Posted by LordSquidworth

Wasn’t the issue they weren’t identifying themselves?

They need to be identifiable. America doesn’t need any black shirts.

How do you know they weren't identifying themselves? Factual info is very difficult to obtain during these riots.

[Roadking2003]

Originally Posted by LordSquidworth

Fire him because he found his backbone for a second there? The top general even found his at that time too.

US military doesn’t belong in our streets. Take your authoritarian bs and go somewhere else.

So, who should protect federal buildings? The boy scouts?

BTW, sending in the US military has been common for decades, if not longer.

Maybe you already forget that Obama sent the military to our southern border in 2011.

[Roadking2003]

Originally Posted by ditchoc

Has Trump ever fulfilled and obligation in his life?

Hundreds. Read about it.

[Roadking2003]

Originally Posted by Hesychios

Sure.

But he doesn't have the right to snatch people off the streets into unmarked cars.

Place guards on property, stay off the streets.

He has the obligation to arrest criminals who are destroying federal property.

[Hesychios]

Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd

Trump is damned if he do and damned if he don't.


If he stands back and lets the Democrats tear up their own cities he is criticized for not caring.
...

Nope.

He needs to stay in his lane. If a governor asks for help he should provide the help he is legally allowed to provide.

If a governor does not ask for help he should stay out of it.

[Roadking2003]

Originally Posted by Hesychios

Nope.

He needs to stay in his lane. If a governor asks for help he should provide the help he is legally allowed to provide.

If a governor does not ask for help he should stay out of it.

So you are OK with the rioters damaging federal buildings?

BTW, did you also oppose previous presidents sending US troops to US cities?

How about Kennedy sending troops to Mississippi in 1962? Did you oppose that move? Or is it only a problem if Trump sends in troops.

[Leo58]

Originally Posted by Roadking2003

So you are OK with the rioters damaging federal buildings?

BTW, did you also oppose previous presidents sending US troops to US cities?

How about Kennedy sending troops to Mississippi in 1962? Did you oppose that move? Or is it only a problem if Trump sends in troops.

Did those troops grab people on the street and throw them into vans? I don't think so. The National Guard doesn't have authority to arrest anyone, and neither does DHS (except for foreigners trying to cross the border).

[Hesychios]

Originally Posted by Roadking2003

So you are OK with the rioters damaging federal buildings?

BTW, did you also oppose previous presidents sending US troops to US cities?

How about Kennedy sending troops to Mississippi in 1962? Did you oppose that move? Or is it only a problem if Trump sends in troops.

I was rather young at the time, how about you?

[sindey]

Originally Posted by Roadking2003

So you are OK with the rioters damaging federal buildings?

BTW, did you also oppose previous presidents sending US troops to US cities?

How about Kennedy sending troops to Mississippi in 1962? Did you oppose that move? Or is it only a problem if Trump sends in troops.

Its a problem when secret police go in unidentified.

[Pilot1]

Originally Posted by sindey

Its a problem when secret police go in unidentified.

You know nothing about legal law enforcement, right? Just spouting Dem talking points makes you sound less than intelligent.