Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Lets be fair here, lots of black folks are just average normal people working a job, got to be careful and resist saying "most" or stuff like that because it's factually not true. Most black folks aren't on the dole and inciting riots and causing HAVOC.
You are correct. But it is also a sad fact that over 75% of black births in America are to single parent women.
And that is why BLM (the marxist movement) is advancing the "raised by the greater village" narrative as one of their core beliefs. This also includes a lot of other people's money of course.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chowhound
To be truthful, I see more white faces in those protests/riots than anything else.
>"There is no doubt that the most effective way to mitigate privilege would be to eliminate the family. Without parents, grandparents, siblings, or any kin relations, we could become equal." <
Patriarchy mean being lead by the male. It definitely has a stigma to say that especially in these times, and again, I don't see too much situations where the man is the big boss. Most women these days have equal say and there is much more parity between couples.
When I say that marriage is a "patriarchal institution", what I means is that it was an institution created by men, and for reasons that have to do with the male experience. There were matriarchal societies in the past and none of them had marriage, or at least marriage was just glorified "dating".
Things like property rights are also a patriarchal institution. Every civilization is functionally patriarchal, whether we have a woman president or not. Matriarchal values are anti-civilization.
Status:
"Let this year be over..."
(set 20 days ago)
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,219 posts, read 17,085,392 times
Reputation: 15538
"The next step in the culture war is the assault on the traditional family"
Wasn't the same call to arms trumpeted back in the 50's/60's when the Nuclear Family was becoming the norm and the "traditional family" was falling by the wayside.....
So now the Nuclear Family is the Traditional Family, that's like The Simpsons going from a public condemnation by a GOP candidate to being the standard of the American Family...
No one has ever been, nor will they ever be, forced to not have a traditional family.
It's a cue to the tribe/mob culture to, from now on, shame, condemn, agitate and cause the truth that nuclear families are a benefit to a civil society to be propagandized as a falsehood.
Add to that the threat of chaos and violence, threats to families (especially when white) as their ammunition, if people fail to submit to their way of thinking.
We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages†that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.
Marxism. Plain and simple. No more families; only “collectivesâ€.
This may be a bold statement, but I believe that only ignorant and uninformed people support BLM. They either agree with Marxism, or haven’t figured out what it is and don’t recognize that BLM is pushing it.
IMO, we are already there. Look at the number of kids raised in daycare. The kids are put in daycare as soon as possible so mom can go back to work. For the most part the kids are in transit or in daycare 12 hours a day. Factor in sleep time and kids are with their parents only a few hours a day.
What's the point of having kids if you intend to give them over to somebody else to bring up?
Many say both parents have to work due to the economy. If that's true, then the village raising the kids is due to the USA economic system, not the communist.
It's a cue to the tribe/mob culture to, from now on, shame, condemn, agitate and cause the truth that nuclear families are a benefit to a civil society to be propagandized as a falsehood.
Add to that the threat of chaos and violence, threats to families (especially when white) as their ammunition, if people fail to submit to their way of thinking.
Pathetic and sick.
I have a prediction. Traditional families will continue. Guaranteed. People will marry, have kids, live with parents, etc. Forever and always.
Not sure where you're coming up with threats to white families and all that business. Lord have mercy. Nobody is going to take away your families. Who cares what people say? Live your life.
IMO, we are already there. Look at the number of kids raised in daycare. The kids are put in daycare as soon as possible so mom can go back to work. For the most part the kids are in transit or in daycare 12 hours a day. Factor in sleep time and kids are with their parents only a few hours a day.
What's the point of having kids if you intend to give them over to somebody else to bring up?
Many say both parents have to work due to the economy. If that's true, then the village raising the kids is due to the USA economic system, not the communist.
And all of that is greatly exasperated by high out of wedlock child birth rates, and absentee fathers.
Married, two parent families have a much lower rate of it, even among the black, blue collar working class.
I have a prediction. Traditional families will continue. Guaranteed. People will marry, have kids, live with parents, etc. Forever and always.
But aren't there far fewer "traditional families" than there were in the past? And even if there are "two-parent households", how many of those are with both biological parents?
Things are far worse than the statistics show because so many women have children by multiple "baby-daddies". I rarely meet a woman with more than two children where all of them have the same father.
Being raised by a non-biological parent is almost as bad as not having one at all.
Since religion is no longer a factor, people mostly get married for the legal benefits/privileges that come with marriage. If you remove those benefits why would anyone get married?
It would be incredibly and almost depressingly easy to abolish the traditional family merely by changing incentives.
Last edited by Redshadowz; 07-28-2020 at 11:18 AM..
The Marxists, as begun through the Frankfurt School, target the three pillars of the west:
The family
The church
The middle class
Thus the policies of the left traditionally are designed to destroy all of the above three. Quite frankly, they have done a pretty good job of it so far. It is not surprising that the left hates Christians (and loves Islam), yet vilifies the two parent family and embraces trade policies to destroy the middle class.
Liberalism is opposed to everything that is descent and good for a society, while embracing elements which lead to cultural destruction.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
