Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So a review of unrelated warrant applications found that they were doing their jobs for the most part. Does this not bother anyone that in the investigation of the Trump campaign there were egregious and questionable "errors" that prompted this review of unrelated warrant applications? So I guess we should be happy that it was only this one investigation into Trump where there was hinky crap going on based on a small sample review?
The FBI's audit came after Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz and the FISA court harshly criticized the FBI for errors in the Carter Page warrant applications in 2016 and 2017 and asked for reviews of the foreign surveillance process. The inspector general found 17 instances of errors, omissions or false statements in the Page applications, prompting the Justice Department to withdraw two of the four Page warrants.
I have no idea how people think this is a cause for celebration and that the Page issue is nothing now.
Those two instances — which involved one misstatement and one omission in separate applications regarding individuals whose identities were not released — were deemed by the law enforcement agencies not to have been so serious that they “invalidated” the secret surveillance warrants the court issued based on that information, wrote Melissa MacTough, the deputy assistant attorney general for national security wrote.
I said this thread is not about subpoenas. None of what you wrote has anything to do with subpoenas. So why are you telling me this? Do you not know what subpoenas are?
So a review of unrelated warrant applications found that they were doing their jobs for the most part. Does this not bother anyone that in the investigation of the Trump campaign there were egregious and questionable "errors" that prompted this review of unrelated warrant applications? So I guess we should be happy that it was only this one investigation into Trump where there was hinky crap going on based on a small sample review?
Kleinman (atty) changing "IS a CIA informant, to is NOT a CIA informant", is intentional fraud, that started the whole thing with spying on Carter Page.
Not telling the FISA court that the DNC paid for the steele dossier was a big thing, as was representing that it was verified. Leaking info to yahoo news, then using that same leaked article to back up their collusion allegations is fraud. Not exactly minor.
Maybe we have a different definition of minor.
Nobody was expecting a big whoop from the DOJ review of its own warrant applications
Go back and read threads about the impending investigation. Some were indeed expecting a big whoop.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
