Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
Well, you had Mitt Romney. The guy's a Boy Scout. Doesn't drink or do drugs and never has. Has been faithful to his wife and has only ever had one wife. Belongs to a religion that -- for all the hatred for them -- produces abnormally moral and upstanding human beings. (Kinda like Judaism there, to be honest.) America rejected him. They tend to reject anyone who just seems too clean.
If you can solve why America doesn't like candidates that are too clean, then you'll have your answer.
|
Not only that, he was extremely moderate, about the only extreme thing about the guy.
Republicans, in spite of the caricature given them by their opponents, have always ran the most moderate compromising candidates available. McCain, the Bush's, Dole.... Democrats used to fawn over McCain because he wasn't any different than them in any meaningful way.
Even Trump's a populist moderate. He's not really a Republican, he just happened to choose that party to run under. Could have just as easily been a Democrat and been hated by the other half, but oh well.
I think the process scares normal people away from running.
We drag them through radioactive sewage-filled mud during election season then expect them to be able to "reach across the isle" when in office. Kind of absurd when you think about it.
The process wears people down, taints them, tires them. I wouldn't put my family through that kind of scrutiny for any reason whatsoever.
We make it sound like we're not just voting for the candidate, we're also voting for their family, their neighbors, their co-workers, their hairdressers, their dog, their car, their schools, their clothing, their musical tastes, etc...... it's just ridiculous.
It seems we'd rather base their wisdom and decision-making skills on superficial things, or things out of their control.
I'm not sure we've sent out our best to be elected in my adult life, certainly haven't put the best into office.