Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Japan had already sent envoys to surrender to the United States, but they wanted something more like an armistice not an unconditional surrender.
Which just goes to show how astonishingly delusional the Japanese leadership was by August 1945. They were in absolutely no position to demand anything from the United States. The only choice they had was to surrender or be annihilated. If we had wanted to, we could have paraded Emperor Hirohito through the streets in chains and then hung him from the highest lamp post. We didn't, of course, and it's a very good thing too, or else we would have engendered the everlasting hatred of every single Japanese man, woman, and child. But the fact is that we could have done this, if we had so desired; and there wasn't a single thing they could have done about it.
Three days later, the second atomic bomb used in warfare was flown to its primary target of Kokura, Japan.
Kokura was spared from conventional bombing because it was reserved for an atomic attack. It was the secondary target on the first mission, but the skies were clear over the primary target of Hiroshima. Then, it was the primary target of the second mission, but overcast conditions forced the mission to divert to the alternate target of Nagasaki.
So, yeah, Kokura is about the luckiest city on the face of the earth.
Which just goes to show how astonishingly delusional the Japanese leadership was by August 1945. They were in absolutely no position to demand anything from the United States. The only choice they had was to surrender or be annihilated. If we had wanted to, we could have paraded Emperor Hirohito through the streets in chains and then hung him from the highest lamp post. We didn't, of course, and it's a very good thing too, or else we would have engendered the everlasting hatred of every single Japanese man, woman, and child. But the fact is that we could have done this, if we had so desired; and there wasn't a single thing they could have done about it.
What is your point?
My point was, the Japanese hoped that by stalling they might get a more favorable agreement from the United States, who might believe the "cost" of invasion was too high. But once the Soviets entered the war, stalling would mean Stalin, and the occupation of Japan by the Red Army. Suddenly unconditional surrender to the United States sounded pretty good.
Basically, it wasn't the nukes that ended WWII, it was Stalin. The firebombing of Japanese cities had already done as much damage as the nukes.
Deliberately targeting civilians is a good plan if you win because it's very effective. If you lose though expect to be hung as a terrorist or war criminal.
73 years ago today, on August 5, 1945, the first atomic bomb used in war was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. (In Japan it was August 6, since they are across the International Date Line from us.)
Three days later, the second atomic bomb used in warfare was flown to its primary target of Kokura, Japan. They found the city obscured by clouds and smoke, and so flew to the secondary target of Nagasaki instead and dropped the bomb there.
Shortly afterward, Japan realized they had no way to stop the Americans from dropping bomb after bomb, wiping out city after city until the Japanese islands became uninhabitable. It also helped that Russia declared war on Japan that day. Japan surrendered, and WWII was over.
Japan didn't know at the time, that those were the only two complete atomic bombs the Americans had been able to produce at that time (plus one more set off in July as a test in New Mexico). They could eventually produce more of the needed fissile material, but it would have taken months or years, so the Americans kept quiet.
The Army estimated that those two bombs, which killed approx. 150,000 Japanese, saved the lives of between 500,000 and 1 million Americans who would no longer have to invade the Japanese home islands to force a surrender, plus saving a million or more Japanese who would have defended their homes to the death.
The Army estimated that those two bombs, which killed approx. 150,000 Japanese, saved the lives of between 500,000 and 1 million Americans who would no longer have to invade the Japanese home islands to force a surrender, plus saving a million or more Japanese who would have defended their homes to the death.
This is trotted out every year. Again, no, there was no force compelling the allies to invade Japan at a cost of 1 million lives. Given that Japan was contained and all but defeated, sacrificing a million in an invasion would have been foolish. The bombs simply forced a quick surrender, which was advantageous strategically. They were a way to win and go home. Let's leave it at that, and drop the false moral posturing.
The nuclear attack may be seen as an extension of LeMay's firebombing tactics against Japanese cities. 1943 estimates showed a half million Japanese would be killed, which turned out to be fairly accurate. Many of the cities struck were equally as devastated as Hiroshima. All told, it was a pretty horrific campaign.
Around 100,000 were killed in a Tokyo firebombing. There are estimates of up to 500,000 killed in the Dresden firebombing.
The casualties were not as high in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Its just that it only took a single bomb.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.