Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus
What would be your explanation on why a Conservative Judge flips to Liberal like Roberts has? How about a bit of intellectual effort on your part?
Since you seem to have already convicted Roberts, WHAT can you point to that without doubt shows Roberts making decisions contradicting the Constitution?
Q followers have known for many months that Chief Justice Roberts was being blackmailed, which might explain his odd rulings.
The only thing "odd" about John Roberts' rulings is that he follows precedent, the Constitution and a strict reading of the law, rather than just voting the way conservatives want him to vote.
If a 'Supreme court justice' turned up in one of these investigations, the FBI, wouldnt be 'sitting him down', the justice HIMSELF, would be telling the FBI how things are going to go and that they will erase his name and any connection to this case!
By itself, the FBI, doesnt have enough power to target a Supreme Court justice, I doubt they would even attempt it either.
Of course they do. Abe Fortas was forced out of the USSC for far less than what is alleged against Roberts.
Q followers have known for many months that Chief Justice Roberts was being blackmailed, which might explain his odd rulings. A 'John Roberts' is in the flight logs. Nothing officially confirmed yet. "Judge" for yourself
Early Tuesday morning, a whistleblower who allegedly works in the federal circuit revealed a Supreme Court justice was seen in various “Epstein tapes” that were recently recovered by investigators.
The shocking part is the canary [Ghislaine?] is telling the feds a certain nation state has been blackmailing this gentleman since prior to his nomination to SCOTUS.What does this mean? This justice was hand picked at the highest levels specifically because he was being controlled via blackmail. [Like most politicians?]
The “nation state” that has been blackmailing the justice was later confirmed to be “one of the 5 eyes” [US, UK, Canada, NZ, Australia]
The SCOTUS justice on the tapes – it is being rumored in the federal court community – has sat down with the FBI to roll on a previous president AND wife [Bill and Hill?] in an effort to keep his position, or more likely, be allowed to gracefully retire before the next SCOTUS term.
“If I were going to predict the future we are going to see a resignation in about 2-3 weeksas the last of the SCOTUS cases for this term are just about done.”
My guess would be for 'health reasons' or 'wants to spend more time with his family.'
Well now.
2020 just keeps getting crazier. And if I were Bill Clinton, I think I would be loading up the nearest airplane and flying to a country with a non extradition treaty.
But then again, Clinton's been in trouble countless times before and nothing ever happens.
Never mind.
Last edited by BeerGeek40; 08-06-2020 at 11:11 AM..
If true, then we might actually see the Impeachment process utilized for what it was actually intended for: Removal of a person so provably and hopelessly corrupt that they have to be removed in order to preserve the sactity of their office.
This is a massive accusation. It requires massive proof. You should never go charging blindly into impeachment proceedings on the flimsiest of grounds like the Dems did last year. You better be damn sure this is for real and seriously criminal before you even consider the removal of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
These antics are to be expected from the FBI, they have been doing this same exact thing from the day they were created!! They dig up 'dirt' on people in high positions and use it against them for their own benefit... FBI has been doing this for decades, they are very skilled at this art form.
A friend of mine who is an attorney and recently ran for a local judge's seat just posted this on Facebook. I thought it relevant to the topic of the thread, even though it was actually in reference to a link to the Business Insider story about Pence calling Roberts a "disappointment to conservatives".
Her FB comments: This is really quite disgusting. A judge or justice’s job is not to do the bidding of a party, Congress or the President. This is what our Vice President seems to be disappointed by. This is misguided, at best, and, at worst, it is a call for judges/justices to be the “Yes” man or woman of a particular party. There is a separation of powers for this very reason. A judge/justice needs to be fair, impartial, and uphold our Constitution. This is essentially a call to ignore those duties.
Last edited by hooligan; 08-06-2020 at 12:22 PM..
Reason: Clarity, I hope.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.