Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-14-2020, 11:52 AM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,449,182 times
Reputation: 13233

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DorianRo View Post
Even to get elected, he had to play the "I am you, I'm for the common man" BS when it clearly has never been true but people bought it and he has shown his true colors the last 4 years of crooked/ Corporate Type corruption all the 1 percent do. . Every generation that is being created is leaning further left and as the income gap continues it only pushes future generations even further to the left..

There isn't enough Millionaires/Billionaires/Corporate executives to stop the swing left
You have touched upon a few things which are important.
  1. The wage/income gap and wealth gap continue to grow, largely a result of Republican policies favoring the very wealthy. Specifically 'supply side' economics.
  2. Society needs to cope with this new reality, therefore social safety nets (Social Security, Medicare and new national health care policies) are becoming increasingly popular and needed. This is what appears to some people as 'left leaning'.

As a result, Republican policies have been becoming less and less popular. In a republic that relies upon the popular vote, this can mean Republican policies will be cast to the dustbin. Progressive taxation on the levels of 1950's USA may be reintroduced and social services may be expanded.

One option for Republican operatives can be to simply deceive the voters, getting them to vote for policies against their own best interests. This seems to be the path currently taken by the party, holding up shiny objects to divert the attention of the people while they take away their protections and their security.

Another option is to change the way we do elections, restricting the vote to 'safe' constituencies and disenfranchising the categories of people which have been hurt the most by these inequitable policies. We see this being attempted in various ways all across the country.

It's a work in process, but the clock is ticking. This is a dangerous situation for the big money backers of the Republican party. If the Republican Party fails to dominate national policy for any length of time, the big money and global corporate interests will find new hosts to infect, and the cadaver of the old party will wither away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-14-2020, 11:54 AM
 
62,872 posts, read 29,103,656 times
Reputation: 18559
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse View Post
It isn't a new thing that younger people tend to lean left, but things may change as they grow older. Once someone learns that nothing is free and where the money for others free stuff is coming from, that sobering thought tends to make one a little more conservative.

It is amusing to hear the young ones lists of wants when it comes to free things. Yes, tax the corporations and drive them from the country, the ones that are left.

I am not seeing the threat. Prepare for 4 more years of Trump, and if the Dems continue as they are, prepare to welcome a President Pence.
Exactly, with age comes wisdom. These brainwashed young voters will find out as they mature that having a Democrat president isn't in their best interests nor the rest of the country with their socialistic, open borders and far left so-called progressive policies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2020, 11:55 AM
bu2
 
24,070 posts, read 14,863,435 times
Reputation: 12904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
You have touched upon a few things which are important.
  1. The wage/income gap and wealth gap continue to grow, largely a result of Republican policies favoring the very wealthy. Specifically 'supply side' economics.
  2. Society needs to cope with this new reality, therefore social safety nets (Social Security, Medicare and new national health care policies) are becoming increasingly popular and needed. This is what appears to some people as 'left leaning'.

As a result, Republican policies have been becoming less and less popular. In a republic that relies upon the popular vote, this can mean Republican policies will be cast to the dustbin. Progressive taxation on the levels of 1950's USA may be reintroduced and social services may be expanded.

One option for Republican operatives can be to simply deceive the voters, getting them to vote for policies against their own best interests. This seems to be the path currently taken by the party, holding up shiny objects to divert the attention of the people while they take away their protections and their security.

Another option is to change the way we do elections, restricting the vote to 'safe' constituencies and disenfranchising the categories of people which have been hurt the most by these inequitable policies. We see this being attempted in various ways all across the country.

It's a work in process, but the clock is ticking. This is a dangerous situation for the big money backers of the Republican party. If the Republican Party fails to dominate national policy for any length of time, the big money and global corporate interests will find new hosts to infect, and the cadaver of the old party will wither away.
Just change the Republican to Democrat and you hardly need to change anything else and you fit the Clinton/Obama Democrats, especially the big money/global corporate interests paragraph.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2020, 12:04 PM
 
13,943 posts, read 5,615,884 times
Reputation: 8603
May 18, 2009:




And after Obama, when the "most qualified candidate EVAR!" was on the slate for the Democrats....the Republicans elected the President. Also of note after 2009, the Republicans retook the House in 2010 and then the Senate in 2014.

If American electoral history teaches anything, it's that neither party stays on top forever, nor the bottom. America likes flipping the script on the two parties, and they like doing it often.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2020, 12:13 PM
 
62,872 posts, read 29,103,656 times
Reputation: 18559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
You have touched upon a few things which are important.
  1. The wage/income gap and wealth gap continue to grow, largely a result of Republican policies favoring the very wealthy. Specifically 'supply side' economics.
  2. Society needs to cope with this new reality, therefore social safety nets (Social Security, Medicare and new national health care policies) are becoming increasingly popular and needed. This is what appears to some people as 'left leaning'.

As a result, Republican policies have been becoming less and less popular. In a republic that relies upon the popular vote, this can mean Republican policies will be cast to the dustbin. Progressive taxation on the levels of 1950's USA may be reintroduced and social services may be expanded.

One option for Republican operatives can be to simply deceive the voters, getting them to vote for policies against their own best interests. This seems to be the path currently taken by the party, holding up shiny objects to divert the attention of the people while they take away their protections and their security.

Another option is to change the way we do elections, restricting the vote to 'safe' constituencies and disenfranchising the categories of people which have been hurt the most by these inequitable policies. We see this being attempted in various ways all across the country.

It's a work in process, but the clock is ticking. This is a dangerous situation for the big money backers of the Republican party. If the Republican Party fails to dominate national policy for any length of time, the big money and global corporate interests will find new hosts to infect, and the cadaver of the old party will wither away.
Yeah, so much better to vote for the Democrats that want amnesty for illegal aliens so they can retain American jobs and overcrowd our schools, jails, hospitals, roads and neighborhoods, who will further deplete our social and natural resources and opposing the wall to help stop more from getting in here.....NOT! That's just the tip of the iceberg on the bad policies promoted by the Democrats that hurt the American worker/taxpayer such as the middle class having to support the lazy do-nothing welfare moochers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2020, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,679 posts, read 21,030,020 times
Reputation: 14232
I think all parties should have a chance, but for god's sake TERM LIMITS on all government lawmakers !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2020, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,471,329 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
You have touched upon a few things which are important.
  1. The wage/income gap and wealth gap continue to grow, largely a result of Republican policies favoring the very wealthy. Specifically 'supply side' economics.
  2. Society needs to cope with this new reality, therefore social safety nets (Social Security, Medicare and new national health care policies) are becoming increasingly popular and needed. This is what appears to some people as 'left leaning'.
As a result, Republican policies have been becoming less and less popular. In a republic that relies upon the popular vote, this can mean Republican policies will be cast to the dustbin. Progressive taxation on the levels of 1950's USA may be reintroduced and social services may be expanded.

One option for Republican operatives can be to simply deceive the voters, getting them to vote for policies against their own best interests. This seems to be the path currently taken by the party, holding up shiny objects to divert the attention of the people while they take away their protections and their security.

Another option is to change the way we do elections, restricting the vote to 'safe' constituencies and disenfranchising the categories of people which have been hurt the most by these inequitable policies. We see this being attempted in various ways all across the country.

It's a work in process, but the clock is ticking. This is a dangerous situation for the big money backers of the Republican party. If the Republican Party fails to dominate national policy for any length of time, the big money and global corporate interests will find new hosts to infect, and the cadaver of the old party will wither away.
wow...how wrong can you be


1. the wage/wealth gap is increasing...not do to republican policies..but do to globalist liberal policies.....btw the wealth gap is increasing in EVERY 1st world nation to include France, Norway, and Denmark


2. 3/4 of our (USA) budget is to social safety net programs, an the spending on them is every increasing our debt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2020, 12:18 PM
bu2
 
24,070 posts, read 14,863,435 times
Reputation: 12904
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
I think all parties should have a chance, but for god's sake TERM LIMITS on all government lawmakers !!!
Yes!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2020, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Georgia
2,707 posts, read 1,032,774 times
Reputation: 1723
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
I think all parties should have a chance, but for god's sake TERM LIMITS on all government lawmakers !!!
I agree 100%!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2020, 12:20 PM
 
Location: My house
7,342 posts, read 3,514,319 times
Reputation: 7728
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
BHO was no moderate...he was a far leftist, who would NOT work with the opposition...the only thing moderate about Obama was he understand that to go far left, it is in small steps
Wait until Gen Z becomes active in politics, history will look at Barack as a conservative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top