Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The people who "stoke" anger and rage aren't nearly as guilty as those who CREATED the anger and rage.
Stoke and create are synonyms in this context.
What you meant to say is that the people who stoke the anger are not as guilty as those that inspire it.
That's enough language arts assistance for the self-inulgently angry, today.
Sure they are. The people who stoke the anger are are 100% guilty.
Just as the violent criminal is 100% guilty for their actions.
Society cannot be responsible for the mental illness and emotional instability of everyone who decides to be angry.
Or those who makes bad choices, are too mentally weak to not indulge in anger, too low IQ to not be able to parse morality, and too undisciplined to change their lives.
What you meant to say is that the people who stoke the anger are not as guilty as those that inspire it.
That's enough language arts assistance for the self-inulgently angry, today.
Sure they are. They are 100% guilty.
Just as the violent criminal is 100% guilty for their actions.
Society cannot be responsible for the mental illness and emotional instability of everyone who makes bad choices, is too mentally weak to not indulge in anger, too low IQ to not be able to parse morality, and too undisciplined to change their lives.
Since society looks the other way, society gets more violence.
Terrorists can invent any agenda and narrative that they wish. That doesn't make the agenda and narrative valid.
Terrorists / sociopaths hurt people to get what they want.
Society doesn't owe terrorists anything.
Yes terrorists are evil. So again, why is it so hard to divide instead of continuing to pretend getting along? I support division of people of different cultures, races, political leaning, income and social status. I support division of terrorists and mentally ill - every single one - out of society.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 7 days ago)
35,630 posts, read 17,968,125 times
Reputation: 50652
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1
Stoke and create are synonyms in this context.
What you meant to say is that the people who stoke the anger are not as guilty as those that inspire it.
That's enough language arts assistance for the self-inulgently angry, today.
Sure they are. The people who stoke thae anger are are 100% guilty.
Just as the violent criminal is 100% guilty for their actions.
Society cannot be responsible for the mental illness and emotional instability of everyone who decides to be angry.
Or who makes bad choices, is too mentally weak to not indulge in anger, too low IQ to not be able to parse morality, and too undisciplined to change their lives.
No, "stoke" and "create" are not synonyms.
I meant to say exactly what I said.
The anger was created and has been bubbling beneath the surface for centuries and is now being vented.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
