USA Today: Black, Indigenous, people of color considered "diverse leadership team" employees (Hispanic, female)

[lovecrowds]

I guess at USA Today that if an employee is non-hispanic caucasian that they are not a member of a "diverse leadership team".

It seems as though if someone just happens to be caucasian and have a disability they are not a considered a contributing member of USA Today's "diversity leadership team"

I wonder why they don't brag about their circulation which is down 77% from 2007. The lower circulation numbers have nothing to with diversity, but it seems that a businesses number one priority is have customers and their print customers are down 77% in just 13 years.

This seems like a desperate ploy to beg for people to become customers, not by bragging about the articles they write but the ethnic group of their employees.

https://awfulannouncing.com/local-ne...hased-out.html

USA Today also bragged that it has a female editor in chief and that the leadership is 57% female.

It's their own business who they hire and the people who they happened to think were the best journalists were 57% female than good, but it's odd they brag about it.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...ge/3386638001/

[ditchlights]

The definition of the words "diverse" and "diversity" change drastically when a liberal gets ahold of them.

Then again, liberalism has that effect on lots of words these days.