Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,562 posts, read 12,535,636 times
Reputation: 10476
Quote:
Originally Posted by kell490
When he was laying on the ground after guy kicked him and he was hit by the skateboard. He could have shot him when he was on the ground from 10 feet away. Grosskreutz said he could have emptied his mag into him but couldn't do it.
When he was laying on the ground after guy kicked him and he was hit by the skateboard. He could have shot him when he was on the ground from 10 feet away. Grosskreutz said he could have emptied his mag into him but couldn't do it.
Actually, I believe he stated he wished he had emptied the mag into him. Well, that was what his friends FB post stated, he lied about it on the stand. I guess one doesn't point a gun at and armed individual without the intent of pulling the trigger. That is kind of one the the rules to carrying a firearm, it should leave the holster unless you are going to use it. Grosskreutz was a just a failure of a human being all around it seems.
Ok, prove that the 2 dead guys (Huber, Rosenbaum) and Unicep Man are “victims” and not “perpetrators” or “suspects” who attacked Kyle.
Regarding the 2nd shooting:
Did KR forfeit his right to self defense by fleeing the first shooting, then upon being pursued by a bystander (grosskruetz) who saw KR as an *active shooter* fail to stop/surrender for police to arrive? KR was not in police uniform and was perceived as an active shooter at the time GG confronted him. Was it reasonable for GG to perceive KR as a dangerous threat?
In the above scenario, does an *active shooter* retain his right to self defense? Or did he forfeit his right to self defense when he shot 4 times and fled the scene?
Wow, I guess I missed that. I knew he had a record but didn't know he was a convicted felon. I apologize to anyone I replied to, I was incorrect.
Why is he not being charged ? More proof our system if flawed.
Those are not convictions
Gaige Paul Grosskreutz has a forfeiture case for not showing obedience to officers, as well as one for loud noises.
He was convicted of a criminal misdemeanor in 2016 for going armed with a firearm while intoxicated. He gave a West Allis address.
People on social media are alleging that Grosskreutz is a Wisconsin felon. However, he has no felony convictions in the Wisconsin court system. This old archived web page alleges he was arrested on burglary charges, but nothing comes up in the court website for that case. He confirmed in court that he has one criminal misdemeanor conviction.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,562 posts, read 12,535,636 times
Reputation: 10476
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck
Wow, I guess I missed that. I knew he had a record but didn't know he was a convicted felon. I apologize to anyone I replied to, I was incorrect.
NP. Many posts in this thread, easy to miss a few or more of them.
Quote:
Why is he not being charged ? More proof our system if flawed.
Too much input from Democrats probably.
Blm will see that it's dealt with after the democrats allow them to abolish our judicial system, which blm had stated they want to do.
He was not a convicted Felon . But he did have a gun And could have easily offed Kyle.
And made an almost fatal mistake. Never draw ones firearm unless the intent is to use it. It is taught in every concealed carry class.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.