Eyewitness Account Shows Kyle Rittenhouse's First Shots Were In Self-Defense (legal, weapon)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To be devil's advocate, Rittenhouse may have been declaring himself a "medic" just as a pretense to be there in the first place. "Ignore my AR15!!! I am just here to provide medical help!!!"
Except for the fact that he was carrying a med kit and treating wounded people. All part of his nefarious plan, eh?
To be devil's advocate, Rittenhouse may have been declaring himself a "medic" just as a pretense to be there in the first place. "Ignore my AR15!!! I am just here to provide medical help!!!"
To be devil's advocate, Rittenhouse may have been declaring himself a "medic" just as a pretense to be there in the first place. "Ignore my AR15!!! I am just here to provide medical help!!!"
Well, that would be too evil. And take too much thought.
Rittenhouse wasn't a licensed medic, but he did have training. He did all the Junior medic and fireman stuff kids his age do there. One o those boyscouts, I guess.
If he wanted a pretense to be there he should have just lit garbage bins on fire.
To be devil's advocate, Rittenhouse may have been declaring himself a "medic" just as a pretense to be there in the first place. "Ignore my AR15!!! I am just here to provide medical help!!!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by naicha
Well, that would too evil. And take too much thought.
Rittenhouse wasn't a licensed medical, but he did have training. He did all the Junior medic and fireman stuff kids his age do there. One o those boyscouts, I guess.
If he wanted a pretense to be there he should have just lit garbage hins on fire.
.... and he gave his bullet proof vest to someone else. He did so because he was going there to treat people.
litterally Annandale_Man, the EVIDENCE doesnt care about your theories. The FACTS IN EVIDENCE clearly demonstrate that Kyle INTENDED to treat people who were hurt. He didnt care if they were protesters, rioters, or people there to protect private property.
Yes looting is so much worse than killing people on site because they’re trying to get a rifle out of a 17 y.o. white boys hands. He’s trying to protect car lots! Let him go! There’s no racial issue here, except if he was black we could make comments about how he shouldn’t have been doing that, and maybe throw in some snide footlocker comment. Bizzaro world.
Perhaps it's too difficult to see from where you are, but those rioting, destroying property, looting are not good citizens pushed to their limit by a tyrannical govt or social oppression....They are THIEVES capitalizing on the weakness of Woke authorities and their own strength in numbers.
My comment earlier was a use of humor to expresss a serious point, but that can be lost on those who splash about in the shallow end of the pool of intellectual analysis.
The judge seemed to show his hand early in this trial which didn't set things up for the prosecution like they probably hoped. Still the media made it seem as though this guy was a vigilante looking for people to shoot so it should be an open and shut case.. could be the media mislead us and likely there is good reason the prosecution is struggling with evidence to convict...
This could be a classic overreach by the prosecution trying to make a name for themselves from a high profile case. Still, its early and you just never know until the jury reads the verdict.
Regardless of the result, i don't expect any riots outside of the rioting complaints from main stream media. Don Lemon will loose his **** but who really cares..
When Lackowski was confronted by Rosenbaum, he had his pals and firepower all around him to back him up. Doubtful that he'd feel the same way if it had been him that Rosenbaum had been chasing down and attacking, with Lackowski's pals nowhere in sight. Easy to be brave in a crowd.
Why was Kyle Rittenhouse alone? Wouldn't it have been reasonable for him to stay with a group of his peers? This is one of the reasons I think he's a child & should've stayed home.
It was his right to be there, just like everyone else that was there. Saying he should have stayed home, goes for everyone else as well.
I agree though, I wouldn't have been there.
He has the poor judgement of a child.
Deciding to protect property by shooting a person is reckless endangerment.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bizzaro world.
