Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Vote For The Outcome Of The Murder Trial Of Kyle Rittenhouse
Guilty - Kyle Rittenhouse murdered those young protesters 72 19.78%
Not Guilty - Kyle Rittenhouse acted in self-defense 292 80.22%
Voters: 364. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2021, 08:58 AM
Status: "I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out." (set 2 days ago)
 
35,600 posts, read 17,927,273 times
Reputation: 50624

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Du Ma View Post
Is that what the eye witnesses said?
I'm talking about the judge's instructions.

And a reasonable person (which is the standard by law, how a reasonable person would behave) would be provoked going to a mob scene and seeing a kid with an AR15 strutting around. That's provocative.

 
Old 11-15-2021, 08:59 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,468 posts, read 12,487,658 times
Reputation: 10439
Quote:
Originally Posted by logiatype View Post
Weapons charge dismissed.

"Judge at Kyle Rittenhouse trial dismisses charge of possession of dangerous weapon." - https://twitter.com/ZekeJMiller/stat...71893072781315
Some of the comments following that tweet are insane
'need to find the ties between the judge and the far right'
it's dismissed because of "white privilege"
etc......
 
Old 11-15-2021, 08:59 AM
 
Location: NYC
6,643 posts, read 2,956,027 times
Reputation: 4479
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
.

Interesting the clause in the self-defense language - that you can find it's not self-defense if the shooter first provoked the aggressors.
That seems perfectly reasonable to me.


What doesn't is claiming that Rittenhouse provoked them simply by being there and armed with a rifle and medkit, and fire extinguisher.
 
Old 11-15-2021, 09:01 AM
 
29,443 posts, read 14,623,440 times
Reputation: 14420
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
I'm talking about the judge's instructions.

And a reasonable person (which is the standard by law, how a reasonable person would behave) would be provoked going to a mob scene and seeing a kid with an AR15 strutting around. That's provocative.
Only in your opinion. Now if he was walking around randomly pointing at people just walking by...then I'd see your point. Seeing someone armed should not be provocative for any reasonable person.
 
Old 11-15-2021, 09:02 AM
Status: "I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out." (set 2 days ago)
 
35,600 posts, read 17,927,273 times
Reputation: 50624
Quote:
Originally Posted by naicha View Post
That seems perfectly reasonable to me.


What doesn't is claiming that Rittenhouse provoked them simply by being there and armed with a rifle and medkit, and fire extinguisher.
In the still images I've seen, I can't see a medkit and fire extinguisher. I see what looks to be about a 14 year old kid strutting around with an AR15. In a mob scene. And wearing medical gloves, for whatever reason.
 
Old 11-15-2021, 09:03 AM
 
3,073 posts, read 3,260,320 times
Reputation: 2503
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
I'm talking about the judge's instructions.

And a reasonable person (which is the standard by law, how a reasonable person would behave) would be provoked going to a mob scene and seeing a kid with an AR15 strutting around. That's provocative.
Sorry, but your definition of a "reasonable" person being provoked by the mere observation of a firearm is like saying that a female dressed in a sexy outfit provoked her rapist by simply being dressed that way. Just because YOU would be provoked by someone legally exercising their rights doesn't mean that a "reasonable" person would be.
 
Old 11-15-2021, 09:04 AM
 
29,443 posts, read 14,623,440 times
Reputation: 14420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Anytime you argue someone is a "Nazi". You lose 100% your credibility.

Sorry, you lose.
Exactly. It's to the point where it's laughable now.
 
Old 11-15-2021, 09:04 AM
 
Location: NYC
6,643 posts, read 2,956,027 times
Reputation: 4479
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
In the still images I've seen, I can't see a medkit and fire extinguisher. I see what looks to be about a 14 year old kid strutting around with an AR15. In a mob scene. And wearing medical gloves, for whatever reason.
Have been watching the trial? If you watched it play out, you'd know why Kyle, at least in their words, was there and what he was doing.

There is a reason. He didn't just parachute in guns a blazing.

It's not as cut and dry like say, that lunatic that drove through protestors a couple years ago.
 
Old 11-15-2021, 09:04 AM
Status: "I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out." (set 2 days ago)
 
35,600 posts, read 17,927,273 times
Reputation: 50624
Quote:
Originally Posted by austinnerd View Post
Sorry, but your definition of a "reasonable" person being provoked by the mere observation of a firearm is like saying that a female dressed in a sexy outfit provoked her rapist by simply being dressed that way. Just because YOU would be provoked by someone legally exercising their rights doesn't mean that a "reasonable" person would be.
Not today, nerd.
 
Old 11-15-2021, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Cali
14,215 posts, read 4,586,282 times
Reputation: 8312
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
I'm talking about the judge's instructions.

And a reasonable person (which is the standard by law, how a reasonable person would behave) would be provoked going to a mob scene and seeing a kid with an AR15 strutting around. That's provocative.
Problems with your argument

-Open carry is legal in WI. Legal with an L
-Can you show us proof that the aggressors AT THAT TIME knew Kyle was 17 and not supposed to have that AR and not after the fact

I’ll wait
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top