Eyewitness Account Shows Kyle Rittenhouse's First Shots Were In Self-Defense (legal, lawyers)

[rstevens62]

Surely the jurors will take into consideration...should they convict someone for self defense...this will make the courts and police the enemy of both the right and the left!!!


This is America....we dont try people for defending themselves!!

[Oldhag1]

The judge doesn’t think he’s guilty, he is really struggling with his instructions.

[ClaraC]

Originally Posted by Rumann Koch

Please vote before the Jury returns

There aren't enough choices.

[Rumann Koch]

Originally Posted by Du Ma

As a cop, I’d rather have people open carry than concealed carry. At least you know who is armed and who isn’t.

There is a reason why CCW REQUIRES permit in most (if not all) gun-friendly states and open carry requires no permit.

The place I have felt most safe is at a gun show.

And everyone is sooooo polite.

[michiganmoon]

The media has propagandized this event so much and in a dishonest way.

Literally MSNBC is telling viewers that the Rittenhouse trial is about opposing white supremacy.

The mainstream media has created a political cult.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...house-coverage

[naicha]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

Ummm...what "protest" are you referring to? I mean, there was a riot occurring, but no protest.

I was gonna say the same thing. Multiple nights of this. This was no arms locked peaceful protest.

And again. It's never answered.

Why Should we allow these riotous arson mobs to rampage through our towns? Why lay down?

When the weak Mayors won't do the job.

Why let others burn your stuff undefended?

[ClaraC]

Originally Posted by austinnerd

Again, you're making things up. There is no legal definition of "shoot to maim", there is only the application of deadly force and whether the use of that deadly force is legally justified. It's understood that the application of a firearm carries with it the likelihood of death regardless of intent.

I'm not making anything up.

Here's the legal definition of "assault with intent to maim"

Assault with intent to maim—Any person who shall assault another with intent to maim or disfigure his person by cutting out or maiming the tongue, putting out or destroying an eye, cutting or tearing off an ear, cutting or slitting or mutilating the nose or lips or cutting off or disabling a limb, organ or member, ...

[Rumann Koch]

A good sign is that the Judge did not constantly bring up Provocation - I think it may even have got lost and the Jury will not consider it.

[scarabchuck]

Originally Posted by michiganmoon

The media has propagandized this event so much and in a dishonest way.

Literally MSNBC is telling viewers that the Rittenhouse trial is about opposing white supremacy.

The mainstream media has created a political cult.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...house-coverage

Only to those brain dead enough to not think on their own.

[Du Ma]

Originally Posted by Oldhag1

The judge doesn’t think he’s guilty, he is really struggling with his instructions.

Safe to say sane people think Kyle is not guilty after watching video evidence and hearing from eye witnesses