Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The bottom line is that you don't have any examples where a DA would refuse to prosecute, but keep on with the claim that no one would prosecute this case. I thought you also indicated this would be over in a day yet here we are at the end of the week, evidently the jury sure thinks there is merit.
How about you give an example of these same circumstances happening before
The quick one, two-day verdict group was unrealistic. Imagine 12 posters entering a jury room and trying to reach a verdict. No way would that happen within 6 or 12 hours. I'd want to hear every argument before sending someone to prison for decades and believe most people feel that way.
I guess today, Monday at the latest, the jury has its verdict or informs the judge they're deadlocked
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 6 days ago)
35,623 posts, read 17,953,728 times
Reputation: 50641
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama
How about you give an example of these same circumstances happening before
The quick one, two-day verdict group was unrealistic. Imagine 12 posters entering a jury room and trying to reach a verdict. No way would that happen within 6 or 12 hours. I'd want to hear every argument before sending someone to prison for decades and believe most people feel that way.
I guess today, Monday at the latest, the jury has its verdict or informs the judge they're deadlocked
From what I’ve seen in the past, the jury doesn’t inform the judge they’re deadlocked but rather requests to be declared deadlocked and then the judge can order them to continue deliberating.
That's not the complaint at all though, the complaint was that the prosecution intentionally gave them a 3x lower resolution version of the video.... which is gross prosecutorial misconduct..... as is them lying about not knowing the identity of "jump kick man".
Withholding evidence from the defense is grounds for immediate mistrial with prejudice.... but that's not the only gross prosecutorial misconduct in this case, the prosecutors also lied to get a manipulated video into the case created with software "for investigative purposes only". The second that was shown it was grounds for a mistrial with prejudice as well.
This is one of the most corrupt, dishonest high visibility trials I've ever seen. Both prosecutors need to face discipline from the bar and possibly criminal charges over their conduct
To the Prosecution and many on the Left, that would be preferable to what otherwise would be the very likely acquittal on all charges.
They knew their politically motivated case was chit when they brought it.
It's Friday. Saw on Court TV yesterday the guy says never underestimate the Friday factor - these people don't want to go through the weekend with it hanging over their heads.
Kyle hopefully is exonerated today and can get on to suing Biden and everyone else who slandered him, into oblivion and be wealthy beyond his wildest dreams for the rest of his life.
Could be Nick Sandmann part II. Sued CNN for $275 million. Settlement not disclosed.
For Kyle, could total a billion with multiple lawsuits. It's why MSNBC is so hellbent on tampering/intimidating the jury.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
