Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We all know it is his right, evidently since the gun charge was dismissed but most decent people can at least admit that he had no business being at the protest armed. No reason why you are beating this deceased horse again.
But he worked at a lifeguard so I give him a pass.
You sure that the "she no business wearing that dress in that neighborhood" isn't a legal argument to defend rapists? From what it seems, our friends on the left would fully support that argument.
He was there defending his town from arsonists.....he had more business being there than most.....and if he wasn't armed, he very likely would be killed or hospitalized by the animals out in the street that attacked him that night.
Moreover, if the police cannot stop the violence named "mostly peaceful protest”, then citizens have the right to organize in groups/militia with weapons in hand to protect their property/businesses/families. Am I wrong?
Leftists make a hero out of a career-criminal like St Fentanyl Floyd. You even give him a statue.
So it’s reasonable for many people to see Rittenhouse as a hero
It shows how demented the dems are, when their heroes are career criminals, and violent thugs, who pray on their neighbors like Floyd did, when he stuck a pistols into a woman's stomach while robbing her home. Or the man who violated a restraining order to rape his girl freind and steal her car, fought the police and went to his car to get his knife. These are the types of thugs Democrat presidents praise and hold up as their Party's heroes.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 8 days ago)
35,631 posts, read 17,968,125 times
Reputation: 50655
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat
You sure that the "she no business wearing that dress in that neighborhood" isn't a legal argument to defend rapists? From what it seems, our friends on the left would fully support that argument.
That is an absolutely irrelevant comparison and you know it. You know it. No one is frightened enough of provocatively dressed women to fear for their safety or the safety of others and so they seek to neutralize the threat. Not relevant to this whatsoever.
But for some reason your crowd keeps dusting this toad off and presenting it like a trophy.
So if a woman goes out walking at 3 am and gets raped and kills the rapist in self defense, it's her fault because why was she out at 3 am alone?
According to the idiot prosecution in this case, she needs to wait until the rapist actually rips off her clothes, holds her down and penetrates her, before she can defend herself from rape. Just like they thought Kyle was supposed to wait until he was almost beaten to unconsciousness, or shot by his own gun, before he could defend himself.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,589 posts, read 12,535,636 times
Reputation: 10476
Quote:
Originally Posted by Du Ma
Third week into this trial and i still hear this coming from the leftists "Rittenhouse should not be there armed with a rifle"
Let's get some facts straight
-IL and WI are US states belongs to the country United States of America. There is no restriction of movement for Americans or non-Americans to travel between states.
-KR has the right to be in Kenosha like any rioter and protester that night on Aug 25
-KR works as a lifeguard in RecPlex in the city of Pleasant Prairie in WI. His dad lives in Kenosha.
-KR used an AR15 to shoot 3 terrorists on Aug 25. The rifle is legal under WI law. Legal with an L
Family, friends, job .. yes, he had more reason to be there than the thugs who'd attacked him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
We all know it is his right, evidently since the gun charge was dismissed but most decent people can at least admit that he had no business being at the protest armed. No reason why you are beating this deceased horse again.
But he worked at a lifeguard so I give him a pass.
That is an absolutely irrelevant comparison and you know it. You know it. No one is frightened enough of provocatively dressed women to fear for their safety or the safety of others and so they seek to neutralize the threat. Not relevant to this whatsoever.
But for some reason your crowd keeps dusting this road off and presenting it like a trophy.
No, it's completely relevant.
Someone simply existing in a place is not justification for assault, sexual or otherwise.
The child rapist wasn't "fearing for his safety" when he ambushed Kyle and attempted to cause death or great bodily injury to him. The lynch mob wasn't "fearing for their safety" when they attempted to cause death or great bodily injury to him as he was running to the police for safety.
Suggesting that the person who was attacked "had no business being there" is the EXACT same argument that a woman is at fault for being in a certain part of town when she was raped.....it's good that at least you can understand that argument is stupid when it comes to rape, hopefully you'll come around and realize that it's also stupid when it comes to other kinds of assault.
We all know it is his right, evidently since the gun charge was dismissed but most decent people can at least admit that he had no business being at the protest armed. No reason why you are beating this deceased horse again.
But he worked at a lifeguard so I give him a pass.
It doesn't matter what you "think" or how you "feel" about this case. This is not your shrink session.
It's what you can establish with facts under letter of the law when you try to get a conviction.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
