Quote:
Originally Posted by TOkidd
You didn’t actually respond to my post. I didn’t say anything about calling 911 or claim Rittenhouse as a hero (it’s others doing that) or debate whether or not his presence in a militia with an illegally possessed weapon was Constitutional. I also didn’t make an argument as to whether his claim of self-defense is bogus or not. That’s for the courts to decide.
I also certainly did not get into the defunding or disbanding of the police or the gang rape and murder of civilians.
So...not sure why you quoted me because your post has nothing to do with mine.
|
Ahhh but it DOES address your post. You tried and convicted the kid in your post. And I rebutted you. You cited facts not in evidence. That he is not a victim. But he was according to him. Unproven. You stated " working with a militia" as if that is a crime. I rebutted.
Then you labeled him a "vigilante". Again stating as fact something unproven. I asked a question basically to that. That being what is a citizen to do under such circumstances? I also added the leftist opinion as to what THEY have believe and have publicly and ad nauseam related citizens should do.
And that boils down to lay down and die. Lest they be labeled a "vigilante" by someone like you. My reply to your post addressed it. Clearly to me, but since you cant see the parallels there....I drew them for you. Carry on. It's probably a good thing your not a prospective juror in this.
Lol, you claim it up to the courts to decide after posting a complete conviction based on conjecture you claim as fact. That's....kinda contradictory....don'tcha think?