Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,602 posts, read 12,543,921 times
Reputation: 10478
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
Indeed it is. Trump has defamed her by publicly calling her a liar, after she accused him of rape. He can only prove she's a liar by submitting a DNA sample. If the sample doesn't match the stain on her dress, the suit gets dropped. If it does match, Trump is confirmed as a rapist and loses the defamation suit as icing on the cake.
It's an all-or-nothing proposition. I know which one I would personally bet on being the liar.
What "stain"?
What does your version of this particular "stain" consist of?
Where on said dress is this "stain"?
How does this "stain" prove that he knows her?
Another dodgy move by an increasingly corrupt administration. The fish rots from the head.
Yes, in this day, and age a president simply cannot say whatever happened before he took office is his personal business, it is now demanded that a president answer questions about his past.
I don't put it past any man in power to commit rape and probably a lot of them have. And if they have, they should be punished accordingly.
And no, I am not a fan of Trump, in fact I can't stand him. But I do not believe E Jean Carroll. She says it happened 26 years ago and she still has his DNA on the dress that she was wearing. So she kept it as "proof" for that long but never once in 26 years thought about pursuing a case against him, until now? Wow. That defies credibility. And I would think that any applicable statutes of limitations have expired by now.
So she kept it for 26 years...and chooses to roll it out 2 months before the election? She has as much credibility as Chrissy Ford. Or Kammie Harris for that matter.
Well, who do you think represents the government in lawsuits filed against government officials acting in their official capacity?
That is the crux of this, isn't it? How can defaming another person be a government official acting in his official capacity? Which government function entails defaming people?
That is the crux of this, isn't it? How can defaming another person be a government official acting in his official capacity? Which government function entails defaming people?
Indeed, that is the real issue here.
We can't have it both ways. You either allow a president to say whatever happened before he was elected is off the table for discussion, or you demand a president answer questions about his past.
Do you like our tax dollars being used to defend Trump’s libel rape case?
The Department Of Justice claim is absurd. Most likely after all the appeals the DOJ will eventually be found to not have standing in the case (after we have spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer money on it), but Barr will successfully have postponed any depositions until after the 'very special day': November 3rd.
And for Trump and Barr that is the point, it is what matters the most. It's not about justice or fairness or honor ... and has nothing to do with Trump doing his 'job' as president.
So the answer is: no, I do not like to see this kind of abuse and corruption in our government.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
