Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Pence's political career ended 4 years ago, as he was far behind in his reelection attempt for the Indiana governorship. He jumped at the chance to be on the ticket as a V-P candidate. Since then, he's been an inconsequential stooge for Trump. I'm afraid that after the Republicans lose the election, they'll try to poison Ruth Ginsburg, so they can ram another conservative supreme court justice through confirmation, before a democratic majority takes over the Senate, on Jan 2nd. That's another trick Trump may have learned from his puppet-master, Putin.
see, there are people that actually believe this nonsense.
Trump has said on numerous occasions if he doesn't win it means the election is rigged and that he is not sure if he will accept the election results.
Those are the ramblings of a despot authoritarian.
so since hitlery has never accepted the election results, has blamed everyone but her self, and has for the last 4 years said the election was stolen from her... you are also calling hillery a despot authoritarian
see, there are people that actually believe this nonsense.
Well that's what we have come to.
We read fantasies from Trumpies all of the time, they must be floating around 'Q' space by the dozens ... but when a Trump opponent comes up with one it's all 'nonsense'.
Nevertheless, political assassination is still a possibility, that is why the Secret Service budget is so large, we know from experience that it could happen.
We also know that Trump doesn't criticize Putin for killing his political opponents, and Putin wants Trump to win.
So we don't have to believe that a Supreme Court justice or a presidential candidate will be murdered for political reasons, but we can not dismiss the possibility. Trump is so soulless I think he would rejoice at the news even if he had nothing to do with it personally, instead of dreading the long term implications of such a horror for our nation.
If Biden is elected and Trump refuses to vacate the White House, the newly-inaugurated President Biden can simply have the Secret Service remove Trump following the swearing-in ceremony on January 20th. Honestly, though, I don’t think it will come to that. Much more likely that Trump will just check out after the election, and spend the following two months playing golf and griping to Carlson and Hannity. Having the Secret Service toss him out on his can is an image I don’t think Trump could bear.
Say's the guy who is voting for two nutjobs who publicly champion communist-style policy and their desire to implement it. In fact, what they propose is WORSE than the USSR's run at communism.
Stay on point, no red herrings here. Now focus, and respond to what I actually said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd
waiting on you to shed some light on this.
This could be quite fun. gimme an example of this so called authoritarian?
This is fun. Calling troops to beat and gas US citizens to take a virtue signaling photo op holding a bible is a fairly authoritarian measure. Trump is inciting division and violence, then claiming he's the only person who can protect us from that same violence. He's removing from his administration anyone who disagrees, and surrounding himself with relatives. He has more criminal indictments in his administration than any other president in history. This has been seen by authoritarian regimes before.
How far does his presidential powers go? What can Trump have planned? No sitting president has ever done this but I wouldn't be shocked if Trump uses this tactic.
The same question can be asked of the Dems. What if? They still haven't accepted that Hillary lost. And I doubt they're going to go quietly if Trump wins again.
dude its illegal for a private citizen to act still in power if they have lost that.. Far worse than using our own resources to get rid of the person who refuses to leave
You missed the point - how idiotic would it be for the first act of a president to do something that is specifically prohibited and are not trained in the task and is not the correct means to do so - you are using emotion to justify illegal activity because of other illegal activity, that is just stupid.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
