Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,593 posts, read 12,535,636 times
Reputation: 10477
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Du Ma
Is it normal for pedos to run backward while chasing minors?
Apparently he was 'leaning in towards Kyle while trying to grab his gun , and doing it all while his back was towards Kyle'. quite talented...i suppose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by motivate1939
Two of the victims were attempting to stop a fleeing felon who they believe had just committed felony murder. Apprehending such a fleeing felon is a perfectly legal action.
Not their job. He was not shooting at random people, who were not attacking him, as he was going down the street. He was also headed towards the police, the very police that were parked right down the street at the end of the block. Lots of police and NG were parked at the end of the block. Everyone including Kyle knew they were there - and Kyle was headed straight towards them.
Sure it was their task if they chose to do it. He appeared to be a person who had just committed a homicide. Who he might kill next was an open question and he still had the AR15. And it appears he shot at Rosenbaum without any knowledge of him. And he was illegally armed.
so Kyle had that AR for the whole night and didn't kill anybody until he decided to shoot Rosenbaum for "no reason" at 11:45PM, right?
Sounds like he is doomed, because that report lays all blame on him.
That's not what I read. This Rosenbaum guy was chasing Rittenhouse and grabbed his AR-15. Rittenhouse reasonable feared for his life and defended himself. Case closed.
The kid was illegally armed. So he had no right to have the rifle or to use it. Practically the reporter involved told the Police the kid did not seem familiar with how to deal with a gun. By shooting someone who is unarmed he is clearly a law violator.
People with law degrees are on the record explaining why you are wrong.
There are links on page 3 of this thread were several lawyers explain the law, and why there is a very good self defense case here. Maybe you should take the time to listen to lawyers, and have an informed opinion.
The kid was illegally armed. So he had no right to have the rifle or to use it. Practically the reporter involved told the Police the kid did not seem familiar with how to deal with a gun. By shooting someone who is unarmed he is clearly a law violator.
Doesn't matter if he was illegally armed.
I was involved in a shooting investigation between two gang members when I was a deputy for LA Sheriff. Gang #1 killed gang #2 using an illegally obtained weapon. In addition, gang #1 was a convicted gang member thus making a prohibited possessor. However, the shooting was ruled as self defense. Gang #1 went to prison and NOT for murder. He went to prison for 2 weapon charges (illegally possessor + illegally obtained weapon).
If a deep blue state like CA with draconian-gun law did not send a convicted gangster to prison for self defense, what makes you think a purple'ish state like WI with lax gun law is going to send a teenager to prison for similar crime?
The kid was illegally armed. So he had no right to have the rifle or to use it. Practically the reporter involved told the Police the kid did not seem familiar with how to deal with a gun. By shooting someone who is unarmed he is clearly a law violator.
Educate yourself !!! Having an illegal firearm doesn't remover someone's right of self defense !!!
Oh you'd better believe that the weaponization of law enforcement and the justice system on behalf of the Left and against the Right is very real, very blatant and very illegal. But when it's the police and the courts trampling your Constitutional rights, who watches the watchmen??
We're reliving the times before the Civil Rights movement. Same story. Only the players have changed. If you'd said 10 years ago that Conservatives would be hunted and executed in the streets, that district attorneys would selectively prosecute Conservatives for clear-cut self defense and that District Attorneys would refuse to prosecute crimes by violent people on the the Left especially those perpetrated against Conservatives -- people would have called you an insane conspiracy theorist. They'd say you're crazy. Welcome to a conspiracy theory come to life, cuz all of that's actually happening.
It's the same story as the McCloskeys defending their house. It's the same story as Joey Gibson being tried for rioting when all Leftist rioting charges are being instantly dropped. If you ever wanted to know what it was like for black people in the Jim Crow South, you're about to find out because that's where things are heading.
they are criticizing "regulated-militia" defense from Kyle's attorney, not the actual shootings.
If the regulated-militia defense fails in court, Kyle will get convicted for possession of dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
