Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-23-2020, 03:50 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,341 posts, read 14,176,868 times
Reputation: 27858

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
So much for trump nominating Constitutional judges.



Leading SCOTUS Candidate Amy Coney Barrett Claims Bible Precedes Constitution
Bottom line is that the law is whatever people say it is.

A liberal like Brennan will disregard his religion when making his rulings.

A conservative like Barrett - won't disregard her religion.

On and on it goes.

 
Old 09-23-2020, 05:29 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,487,434 times
Reputation: 4621
Quote:
Originally Posted by tillman7 View Post
Sad, beliefs based on a book of fiction.
I don't hold that against Biden. I was ok with Obama believing the Bible. I had a lot against Hillary, but her believing the Bible is true isn't one of them.
 
Old 09-23-2020, 06:15 AM
 
364 posts, read 120,486 times
Reputation: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicano3000X View Post
Handmaid's Tale

Good lord, you will believe anything your fed.
So sad our country has come to this.
 
Old 09-23-2020, 06:18 AM
 
58,749 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14186
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Amy is a nutcase bible thumper, exactly who Trump’s handlers want.
"When you have NOTHING of value to add, throw childish insults", as they say!

Are you so insecure in your own faith beliefs that you have to attack others for theirs?
 
Old 09-23-2020, 06:25 AM
 
58,749 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14186
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
Lagoa is a safer pick here, save Amy for a Justice Thomas replacement down the road. We need balance in the court. Lagoa replacing RBG is a shift to the right, but not the huge shift that Barrett replacing RBG would be.
"We need balance in the court." When did the left ever worry about that?

FDR had ALL SC justices appointed by HIM.

The left already is talking about "packing" the court.

In general, I agree with you but, NOT in today's world. We need to shut down those trying to overturn the Constitution and what our Founding Father's created.
 
Old 09-23-2020, 06:31 AM
 
58,749 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
That is hardly clear as to what deity is being addressed. Anyway "God" is not religion. There are many faiths which are not aligned with Christian beliefs or the Bible represented in the US. They are different than yours. They have their own books, writings, and prophets. Do your beliefs take precedence over theirs? Are they to be ignored? The constitution seems clear that no "religion" can be part of the laws of the US - the Catholic taith and the Bible included. The Bible has no place in the decision of the courts.
" The Bible has no place in the decision of the courts.", yet EVERY court witness put his hand on the Bible and the last words are "so help me God".

"Thou shall NOT kill" Thou shall NOT steal, etc. Where do you think these laws originated from?
 
Old 09-23-2020, 06:34 AM
 
58,749 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14186
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
Yes I read the article that he/she said she said.
What did she say in context.
What report in the AFJ from the report. "Much of the concern about Barrett’s religious extremism is documented in a report from the Alliance for Justice (AFJ). According to the report, Barrett believes that “judges should be bound by their religious faith, not the law.”
Was it from
“Catholic Judges in Capital Cases.” Where she discusses judges recusing themselves if there be a conflict between their religion and the constitution in capital cases. Did you read that?

So again, specifically can you link quote where SHE said justices should put their religious beliefs before the constitution in deciding cases?
The left is infamous for taking things said OUT OF CONTEXT and OMIT much of what is actually said or written.
 
Old 09-23-2020, 06:43 AM
 
58,749 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Blevin View Post
Article is stupid.

This is almost the same argument they used against Clarence Thomas because he believed in "Natural Law". In all instances, Thomas has been a stalwart at following the simple words and original intent of the Constitution, and not employing "Natural Law" where not sourced in the Law as codified by the US Constitution.

I have yet to hear a single utterance by Clarence Thomas where he just pulled judgements out of his ass, like the revisionists do.

I have no clue what to think of ACB yet, but her reference to the bible sounds a lot like Thomas's reference to "Natural Law", and indicates she would follow a strict original reading of the constitution, rather than saying "Well, the Old Testament requires an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

Stupid article is preposterous, but I would expect 100 ridiculous attacks a day on any presumptive Trump nominee.
The hypocrite left goes after repub Catholics, claiming their religion wiill make them do all sorts of things, yet NEVER go after Catholic DEMS like biden, pelosi, etc.

They even ELECTED a Catholic president who appointed his BROTHER to be the AG. They voted over and over for a Catholic, another brother as their senator who KILLED a young woman and not ONCE did they bring up what their religion wiill make them do.
 
Old 09-23-2020, 06:51 AM
 
58,749 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
To a leftie, a person of religious faith is 'dangerous' but someone out rioting and looting should be heralded as a hero. Bizarro world for sure.
Unless they are a DEM, then their religion is NEVER talked about, much less criticized.
 
Old 09-23-2020, 06:52 AM
 
58,749 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14186
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Bottom line is that the law is whatever people say it is.

A liberal like Brennan will disregard his religion when making his rulings.

A conservative like Barrett - won't disregard her religion.

On and on it goes.

Right! Wanna buy a bridge?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top