Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Entirely subjective, and a violation of their most fundamental rights. Who decides that, and how could that possibly be a crime or even a tort.
"We, the jury in the undersigned case find you guilty of putting yourself in a situation you shouldn't have." Really? We have a right to put our selves in any situation we want other than one that violates law, without onus, waiver of rights etc..
As a minor- have rights??
There are three reasons that minors do not have the same constitutional rights as an adult: the vulnerability of children, their limited decision-making capacity, and the important role parents play in making decisions for their children.
Under the law, children in the United States are fully formed human beings with the same basic constitutional rights that adults enjoy. Like every other citizen, children have the right to due process under the law and the right to counsel. They're also protected against cruel and unusual punishment and unreasonable searches and seizures. https://people.howstuffworks.com/do-...nal-rights.htm
Have they said how he will be tried? its in his best interest as a child but I don't know the states stips/
There are three reasons that minors do not have the same constitutional rights as an adult: the vulnerability of children, their limited decision-making capacity, and the important role parents play in making decisions for their children.
Under the law, children in the United States are fully formed human beings with the same basic constitutional rights that adults enjoy. Like every other citizen, children have the right to due process under the law and the right to counsel. They're also protected against cruel and unusual punishment and unreasonable searches and seizures. https://people.howstuffworks.com/do-...nal-rights.htm
Have they said how he will be tried? its in his best interest as a child but I don't know the states stips/
That's why he was charged for possession of dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
But the homicide charges are stupid. A minor still has the right to defend his life against any attacker.
Status:
"Let this year be over..."
(set 21 days ago)
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,219 posts, read 17,088,442 times
Reputation: 15538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Du Ma
I think what he meant is a woman with CCW should not be walking around the bad part of town at midnight. If something bad happens to her (aka rape), then she forfeits her right to shoot the rapist in the face. But if she shoots the rapist in the face in self defense, then she should go to prison for putting herself in a bad situation.
But in your case the individual was attacked for no reason and was in a legal place not under a police restriction order and was legally carrying. But I am referring to a minor who crossed state lines to go to a place that had a "State of Emergency Curfew in effect east of I-94 Tuesday night, Aug. 25" as there had been a "Countywide emergency curfew in effect until 7 a.m. Monday, Aug. 24". He armed himself illegally with a long rifle and put himself in a situation he was ill prepared to encounter leading to him killing an unarmed man and you don't see how his actions lead to this situation which could have been avoided as I originally stated.
But in your case the individual was attacked for no reason and was in a legal place not under a police restriction order and was legally carrying. But I am referring to a minor who crossed state lines to go to a place that had a "State of Emergency Curfew in effect east of I-94 Tuesday night, Aug. 25" as there had been a "Countywide emergency curfew in effect until 7 a.m. Monday, Aug. 24". He armed himself illegally with a long rifle and put himself in a situation he was ill prepared to encounter leading to him killing an unarmed man and you don't see how his actions lead to this situation which could have been avoided as I originally stated.
every single person at that protest violated curfew violation. what is your point?
Yeah, he committed a crime "possession of dangerous weapon by a person under 18" and they charged him for it. But that does not mean he cannot defend his life.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
