Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If Barrett believes men have authority over their wives, then her husband should be vetted for the seat, since she will naturally defer to him on any decision.
The Newsweek story said the group was one of the ones that inspired Margaret Atwood when she wrote The Handmaid's Tale. It was actually a similarly named group. There's a correction reflecting that at the end of the article.
Gonna park this here... and in every one of these threads about this good woman.
US Constitution
Article VI paragraph 3
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
So, she's a submissive handmaid in a kooky sect ...who somehow managed to make it to the Supreme Court short list. Seems like someone let her out of the house long enough to do all that.
My guess is that Trump is trolling the media by making it look like she's the pick. They spend an entire week bashing Catholics and making themselves look bad, and then he'll pick Lagoa.
I sense a Panic in your voice....
Lagoa is a Catholic too, you dummies.... and you have no idea how she see's constitutional text about Abortion v. Life, Liberty & Property.
The Newsweek story said the group was one of the ones that inspired Margaret Atwood when she wrote The Handmaid's Tale. It was actually a similarly named group. There's a correction reflecting that at the end of the article.
in point of fact, the so called "correction" is an admission that the entire article is utterly and completely false but they aren't taking it down. they aren't issuing a retraction. they aren't issuing an apology for their zealous over reach in an effort to destroy this woman.
The FACT is, the article is based on an utterly false premise. They have left the article in tact and at the end said "this isn't really true but it could be true"
That is evil. if you are defending news week, you are defending evil.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
