Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2020, 12:47 AM
 
301 posts, read 183,125 times
Reputation: 600

Advertisements

With the left losing their minds over the possibility of a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court, i wonder how many actually know what the makeup of the 1973 Supreme Court was that ruled in favor of a woman’s right to have an abortion? Was it 5-4 liberal? Maybe 6-3 liberal?

The court at the time of the ruling was 6-3 conservative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2020, 12:50 AM
 
Location: Ohio
1,037 posts, read 435,224 times
Reputation: 753
No, it was a 7-2 decision. Harry Blackmun authored the opinion. I do not know the leaning makeup unless researched.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2020, 03:28 AM
 
Location: Eugene, Oregon
11,122 posts, read 5,589,229 times
Reputation: 16596
For a long time, the Supreme Court, as well as a large majority of our people, have favored allowing a woman to make her own choice. Any politician who is foolish enough to buck up against that reality, will lose more votes than will be gained. Trump's thinking that he may jump ahead in the election, by throwing a conservative court appointment to his followers, may actually be furthering his own demise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2020, 04:12 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,649,302 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
For a long time, the Supreme Court, as well as a large majority of our people, have favored allowing a woman to make her own choice. Any politician who is foolish enough to buck up against that reality, will lose more votes than will be gained. Trump's thinking that he may jump ahead in the election, by throwing a conservative court appointment to his followers, may actually be furthering his own demise.
But not likely !!!

Trump said before getting elected the kind of judges he would nominate !!!
Not keeping his promise would do more harm and make him look like a RINO or a democrat !!!

Trump has been outstanding and remarkable when it comes to keeping his promises !!!
Some people say he's kept more promises than he made !!! A President like no other !!!

Last edited by phma; 09-26-2020 at 04:21 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2020, 07:36 AM
 
301 posts, read 183,125 times
Reputation: 600
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTU2 View Post
No, it was a 7-2 decision. Harry Blackmun authored the opinion. I do not know the leaning makeup unless researched.
I did not say it wasn’t. I simply stated that 6 of the 9 jurists were conservatives. The ruling was of course 7 to 2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2020, 07:45 AM
 
13,601 posts, read 4,931,126 times
Reputation: 9687
That’s what I have said before- you could stack the court with nine conservatives and Roe v Wade is likely to remain the law of the land. The Court very rarely goes against precedent.

In that way it is similar to the Catholic Church. A pope can never declare a doctrine that contradicts a doctrine from a previous pope, because to do so would undermine faith in the Churches authority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2020, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,461 posts, read 7,087,596 times
Reputation: 11700
Quote:
Originally Posted by robrelo View Post
With the left losing their minds over the possibility of a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court, i wonder how many actually know what the makeup of the 1973 Supreme Court was that ruled in favor of a woman’s right to have an abortion? Was it 5-4 liberal? Maybe 6-3 liberal?

The court at the time of the ruling was 6-3 conservative.



As a libertarian leaning Conservative, I don't really have a dog in the abortion fight.

I personally think it's abhorrent in almost all cases but that doesn't mean that I think it should be illegal on a Federal level.


But it's astounding how many on the Left are so uninformed that they think that if Roe vs Wade is overturned that abortion will automatically become illegal nationwide.

If by some chance the SC does overturn, it simply goes back to being decided on by the individual states. And that's how it should be anyways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2020, 07:56 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,758,356 times
Reputation: 16993
I personally don’t think it will be overturned except the Democrats like to speculate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2020, 07:58 AM
 
7,240 posts, read 4,548,286 times
Reputation: 11921
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbieHere View Post
I personally don’t think it will be overturned except the Democrats like to speculate.
I think people who think it will be overturned to be absolutely delusional. If they be on the left or the right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2020, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,490 posts, read 17,226,594 times
Reputation: 35783
Roe V Wade is not going to be over turned even if there were 9 conservative justices but the Democrats sure like to spread fear that they will.

The Democrats use fear to gain votes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top