Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She said something a few days ago that I've never heard any judge, much less a Supreme Court justice, say.
I don't have the exact words, but the gist was:
A law means what the people who wrote and ratified it meant at the time they wrote it. And it is not judges' job to "update" it or otherwise modify it from that. Instead, that is Congress's job.
That is bedrock. If she sticks to that... and even better if she persuades other justices of its truth... then she will be the best Supreme Court Justice in my lifetime.
Agree, maybe Scalia said it too, but if she is at least nearly as originalist as him then that's pretty good.
The young lady who's speaking now - Crystal Good - apparently is willing to murder her child so she can fulfill her dreams. Maybe she should have thought of her "dreams" before she hopped in the sack.
Is it just me, but is anyone else having to mute these Democrats at times? I just can’t stand their bloviating.
I listen to them but it's all the same theme, race, race race, gays, abortion, discrimination and identity politics, free stuff, Trump and Republicans and whites are in Hillary's basket of deplorables. So basically nothing relevant to the nominee.
Maybe she should have thought of her "dreams" before she hopped in the sack.
Thank for you for bringing back the discussion to the root of the anti-choice position, which is judging and controlling other people's sexual decisions. That reasoning is always at the forefront of your argument.
I can’t watch it anymore. Democrats are a bitter bunch of babies who still won’t accept that the people had spoken at our last election. Reality is nothing with which they’re familiar.
Thank for you for bringing back the discussion to the root of the anti-choice position, which is judging and controlling other people's sexual decisions. That reasoning is always at the forefront of your argument.
There's something to taking personal responsibility for your actions.
Laura Wolk is to be admired. I would admire her even if she was speaking against Judge Barrett.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.