Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So did anyone else note the irony that Booker opined on the disparity caused by the 1994 Crime Bill, a bill ushered thru the senate by Joe Biden.... and repealed by Donald Trump?
once again you show you inability to understand the American system. She is a judge. She isn't supposed to have predispositions. She is supposed to follow the law and apply the constitution.
period.
There is zero reason for her to expound on political or even scientific jibber jabber outside of the scope of the law.
But you are a left therefore you think she needs to be a crusader for your causes.
She didn't say she didn't have an opinion on climate change - she said that she's not a scientist and not an expert on the subject, and therefore could not comment on it.
Are you a scientist and expert? I have an opinion that's backed by a certain amount of scientific background, but I'm not in the position of making expert commentary. So I doubt that any judge at any level is able to do that either.
I sure am glad Booker's social justice lecture is over.
but we are starting a new one with harris...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.