Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:45 AM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,086 posts, read 10,747,693 times
Reputation: 31493

Advertisements

We are finding that humans (our main concern, naturally) are not the only animals that get Covid. There was a news article recently that hundreds of minks on a fur farms were dying from Covid. So, lets assume then that wild animals: Rabbits, Squirrels, and Mice, can get it. We know bats might have been the original source. So we will likely be surrounded by cuddly little furry creatures that are infected. They won't be getting the vaccine. I have had two dead rabbits in the yard recently. If you like to hunt and like to eat wild game you might want to be more careful until more is known.

 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,068 posts, read 14,444,601 times
Reputation: 11256
The vaccine is the end game.

Complicating this whole COVID thing is how political it has all become.
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:47 AM
 
1,253 posts, read 502,888 times
Reputation: 747
Of course it's not going away. That's why so many of us were saying hiding from he virus is not a strategy. Europe is now finding that out the hard way.
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:49 AM
 
1,253 posts, read 502,888 times
Reputation: 747
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
Vaccine.

.
A vaccine will not eradicate the virus, especially when many prominent people are trying to convince people any vaccine that comes about while Trump is president is a vaccine no one should take. See Biden/Harris.
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:52 AM
 
1,253 posts, read 502,888 times
Reputation: 747
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoBromhal View Post
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm


would it be reasonable to assume it would be no more effective than the flu vaccine? 40-60%?

do most of us agree that Covid appears to be more lethal than the flu?

As such, you're OK now with higher death counts from Covid than from the flu?
It's only more lethal to a certain segment of the population. To another segment of the population, Covid is actually less lethal than the flu.
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,103 posts, read 41,267,704 times
Reputation: 45146
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoBromhal View Post
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm


would it be reasonable to assume it would be no more effective than the flu vaccine? 40-60%?

do most of us agree that Covid appears to be more lethal than the flu?

As such, you're OK now with higher death counts from Covid than from the flu?
No, it is not reasonable to assume the efficacy will be anything like that of flu vaccine. Different virus, different vaccines.

Yes, COVID-19 is more lethal than flu.

Why should that make anyone be OK with the higher death count?
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:55 AM
 
20,459 posts, read 12,381,706 times
Reputation: 10254
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoBromhal View Post
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm


would it be reasonable to assume it would be no more effective than the flu vaccine? 40-60%?

do most of us agree that Covid appears to be more lethal than the flu?

As such, you're OK now with higher death counts from Covid than from the flu?
first of all its more deadly because its new. that doesn't mean it will always be that deadly. There is evidence that it is mutating to become less deadly. That's actually the expected (SCIENTIFIC) result.


its called attenuation. The virus has to be less deadly to survive and move from host to host. that's kind of a thing.


beyond that, we are gaining better understanding of how it works and what can be done to combat it.
Then there are new therapeutics coming on the market that are game changers.


more than likely it wont go away. more than likely it will attenuate. more than likely we will be able to treat it quickly.


more than likely the existence of COVID19, the medical/scientific community have learned some things that have changed the approach in the future and will leave us vastly more prepared for the next round of crazy pandemic
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
6,933 posts, read 2,390,775 times
Reputation: 5004
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
We are finding that humans (our main concern, naturally) are not the only animals that get Covid. There was a news article recently that hundreds of minks on a fur farms were dying from Covid. So, lets assume then that wild animals: Rabbits, Squirrels, and Mice, can get it. We know bats might have been the original source. So we will likely be surrounded by cuddly little furry creatures that are infected. They won't be getting the vaccine. I have had two dead rabbits in the yard recently. If you like to hunt and like to eat wild game you might want to be more careful until more is known.

Good grief, go hide under your bed.

 
Old 10-21-2020, 12:22 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
No, it is not reasonable to assume the efficacy will be anything like that of flu vaccine. Different virus, different vaccines.

Yes, COVID-19 is more lethal than flu.

Why should that make anyone be OK with the higher death count?
How many Covid deaths are you willing to risk by ending the lockdowns, and reopening the economy?

If the answer is "zero", then you have set an impossible standard. To know that there is zero risk requires omniscience that extends infinitely out into the future. Human beings do not have omniscience, and thus, by your standard, you will never support reopening the economy. Are you willing to admit this?

If the answer is something higher than zero, then you agree with me. You are willing to risk Covid deaths by reopening the economy. How many deaths would you consider to be acceptable losses? What would the survival rate have to be?
 
Old 10-21-2020, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
Oh so then when would restrictions be removed? What is the next goal post?
I don't have the answers to those questions. We don't have a vaccine yet. We don't know how quickly the incidence will drop when a vaccine does become available. For some infectious diseases such as measles and polio, incidence dropped like a rock, people were that eager to get the vaccine for themselves or their kids. (Most adults had already had measles.)

I don't work in Covid research, so I don't know exactly what the next goal post will be.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top