Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2020, 06:09 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,563 posts, read 12,525,568 times
Reputation: 10475

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzy24 View Post
Because this Ghislaine woman has secrets and the dirt on Trump. He wouldn't dare bad mouth her. It's why he wished her well.
What dirt? That Trump was the only one to speak to the victims lawyer, to help the victims?
Where was Obama, Biden, Bush, Clinton, McCain, etc., etc.?<<< All of them knew, not a one of them did a thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-21-2020, 06:13 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,368,360 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzy24 View Post
I don't think so because tomorrow's transcripts is focused on Prince Andrew, I believe.

Maxwells attorneys will very reasonably appeal this, with a clear ability to show irreparable harm. This wont come out til after it hits the SC I suspect.



But can you imagine if it implicates prince andrew? The overseas news groups will have collective heart failure trying to cover it all.


Im curious if it will implicate Dershowitz to be honest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:54 PM
 
7,489 posts, read 4,954,307 times
Reputation: 8031
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzy24 View Post
I don't think so because tomorrow's transcripts is focused on Prince Andrew, I believe.
What's the fixation on Prince Andrew. Is it because Epstein is dead - hit the next man who has a public persona? Even if Prince Andrew's toes were sucked by a 17 year old girl in London at Ghislane's house, it doesn't matter. It's legal in England for 17 year old females to have sex and suck toes of men of all ages. It's a human right. Feminists should agree.

The reason the woman is a monster is because she procured, coerced and threatened girls for Epstein in the USA.

Prince Andrew knew Epstein and there's a woman who has a photo of herself with Andrew. How does standing for a photo jump to rape allegations? The photo wasn't taken on Epstein's Island where girls were trapped, it was taken in London - with the tube, 8 million people and airports. Where are the photos of other men that profited from a friendship with Epstein at his Island or various homes? Why aren't they in the news like a collage of offenders, or was Prince Andrew the only friend that Epstein had?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2020, 11:56 PM
 
7,489 posts, read 4,954,307 times
Reputation: 8031
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Maxwells attorneys will very reasonably appeal this, with a clear ability to show irreparable harm. This wont come out til after it hits the SC I suspect.



But can you imagine if it implicates prince andrew? The overseas news groups will have collective heart failure trying to cover it all.


Im curious if it will implicate Dershowitz to be honest.
I too am curious whether a lawyer profited from deals with and for Epstein.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2020, 12:29 AM
 
15,530 posts, read 10,501,555 times
Reputation: 15812
I know we all hate Epstein, but I don't believe a darn thing that woman says.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2020, 03:11 AM
Status: "“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”" (set 2 days ago)
 
Location: Great Britain
27,175 posts, read 13,455,286 times
Reputation: 19472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lieneke View Post
What's the fixation on Prince Andrew. Is it because Epstein is dead - hit the next man who has a public persona? Even if Prince Andrew's toes were sucked by a 17 year old girl in London at Ghislane's house, it doesn't matter. It's legal in England for 17 year old females to have sex and suck toes of men of all ages. It's a human right. Feminists should agree.

The reason the woman is a monster is because she procured, coerced and threatened girls for Epstein in the USA.

Prince Andrew knew Epstein and there's a woman who has a photo of herself with Andrew. How does standing for a photo jump to rape allegations? The photo wasn't taken on Epstein's Island where girls were trapped, it was taken in London - with the tube, 8 million people and airports. Where are the photos of other men that profited from a friendship with Epstein at his Island or various homes? Why aren't they in the news like a collage of offenders, or was Prince Andrew the only friend that Epstein had?


They only have the word of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a woman now making lots of money from the accusations.

In terms of Prince Andrew he has had to step down from the Royal Family and go in to quiet retirement.

As for the London allegation, Scotland Yard have already investigated and took no further action due to a total lack of credible evidence.

However it should be noted that Prince Charles, the future King will do everything in his power to protect his younger brother, and even apply judicial precedent if necessary.

Quote:

On July 2, authorities arrested Epstein’s former companion and accused madame, Ghislaine Maxwell. Since then, questions have been raised about if Prince Andrew will be extradited to the U.S. to speak to investigators in the Epstein case.

The Express noted that biographer Nigel Cawthorne explained in his book, Prince Andrew: Epstein and the Palace, that the duke “could only try to plead against potential extradition if he had immunity from prosecution as a government official or as a member of the queen’s household.”

Cawthorne wrote, “It is accepted that it is the one get-me-out-of-a-US-jail card before one gets shunted into the American legal system,” and the “get-out-of-jail card precedent was set by Charles.”

The author elaborated adding, “The Prince of Wales was sued in 1977 after a 10-minute address he gave at the opening of the University of Cleveland’s law faculty building. Before it could go any further, however, the U.S. State Department intervened and extended legal immunity to Charles. The prince had set a frequently cited precedent that would now be the best chance of avoiding extradition [should it be requested] for his younger brother.

Prince Charles’ ‘Get-Out-of-Jail’ Card Could Save Prince Andrew From Extradition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2020, 12:07 PM
 
7,489 posts, read 4,954,307 times
Reputation: 8031
It looks like it will come down to one accuser pointing fingers at Prince Andrew, and everyone else claiming it didn't happen. A photo of two people together does not imply rape, so, in a fair system, Prince Andrew should be exonerated.
"Jeffrey Epstein's ex-girlfriend denied introducing Britain's Prince Andrew to underage sex partners in a defensive and combative deposition made public Thursday, calling the prince's accuser an "awful fantasist."

"Are we tallying all the lies?" Ghislaine Maxwell asked during the 2016 deposition, saying she could not recall taking Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre out for a night of clubbing with Andrew in London. "Her tissue of lies is extremely hard to pick apart what is true and what isn't."
...

Giuffre has accused Epstein of arranging for her to have sexual encounters with numerous wealthy and influential men, including Prince Andrew. He and the other men have denied her allegations."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/maxwel...tein-1.5772606
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2021, 08:21 PM
 
5,104 posts, read 2,050,159 times
Reputation: 2319
Sorry if it's not the right thread to dust this one but I saw this article posted recently new documents about Ghislaine Maxwell who'll be made public. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1876849.html

Quote:
A federal judge ruled on Thursday that dozens of documents belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, an associate of deceased convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and her personal affairs must be made public in the next two weeks.

The documents contain information pertaining to Ms Maxwell’s finances and her relationship with the Clintons, according to a Daily Mail report.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2021, 04:49 AM
Status: "“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”" (set 2 days ago)
 
Location: Great Britain
27,175 posts, read 13,455,286 times
Reputation: 19472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hrw-500 View Post
Sorry if it's not the right thread to dust this one but I saw this article posted recently new documents about Ghislaine Maxwell who'll be made public. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1876849.html
It depends what the documents are.

Ghislaine is very intelligent and after her fathers death, she shredded a lot of documents, and I have no doubt that a lot of the evidence in relation to Epstein will also have been shredded.

As for the latest development, Maxwell's Lawyers are now arguing that the same law applies to Maxwell as that which saw Bill Cosby released, as Epstein cut a deal with prosecutors in the US which included Maxwell.

Ghislaine Maxwell should have charges dropped under 'Bill Cosby rules', her lawyers say - Sky News

Last edited by Brave New World; 07-03-2021 at 04:59 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top