Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It wasn't referencing any WSJ article at the time the poster you attacked made his comment. You were wrong. You should apologize.
For what? Knowing that probably most of us here can't/won't pay to read the WSJ article, he did the next best thing - posted an article that all of us can read. After all, the NewsWeek article is quite clear that it is reporting on the WSJ article. I guess you didn't read it?
President Trump’s family members had Secret Service protection on more than 4,000 trips in the first three years of his term, according to figures released by a government watchdog group.
Did you even read the thread title? This entire thread is about a WSJ article. How would someone reply to a thread that didn't exist?
The thread title does not mention a WSJ article.
Nor does any comment in this thread until comment #15, which was posted after the comment that you responded to. Pay attention.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
