LIVE: Swearing-In Ceremony of Judge Amy Coney Barrett as Associate Justice of SCOTUS (illegal, Pelosi)

[Kibby]

The Rule of LAW will prevail.
The US CONSTITUTION will Prevail. That’s a Good Thing

I understand the anger of the Leftists who wish otherwise.

[janelle144]

Originally Posted by bmccormick71

Just another self righteous conservative scumbag.

Vote while you still can. This court will decide that states aren’t allowed to have elections anymore.

Wow, such hate.

[PotatoMan]

Originally Posted by bmccormick71

Just another self righteous conservative scumbag.

Vote while you still can. This court will decide that states aren’t allowed to have elections anymore.

Really.?

[Tigeru]

A black guy confirming a woman to the Supreme Court. If that isn't a diverse party then what the hell is? Eat shid terrorcrats.

[Erratikmind]

Originally Posted by bmccormick71

Just another self righteous conservative scumbag.

Vote while you still can. This court will decide that states aren’t allowed to have elections anymore.

Move quickly before the sky drops down on top of your head.

[BobNJ1960]

Originally Posted by Kibby

The Rule of LAW will prevail.
The US CONSTITUTION will Prevail. That’s a Good Thing

I understand the anger of the Leftists who wish otherwise.

In many cases, they have disdain for the Constitution. It was chilling how little time Demoncrats spent even mentioning it while grilling this outstanding new SC associate.

[sholomar]

Good luck to her.

[Corrie22]

Originally Posted by Tigeru

A black guy confirming a woman to the Supreme Court. If that isn't a diverse party then what the hell is? Eat shid terrorcrats.

you don't get it.....Trump is a lot more evil than that...and a lot smarter

Guess who was the committee chairman who launched the “high-tech lynching” against then Judge Clarence Thomas......>>> Joe Biden

..and who does Trump ask to swear in Amy?

>>>>Clarence Thomas<<<<<

[bmccormick71]

Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian

I realize you're being purposely absurd out of anger and resentment, but why would adding a strict constitutionalist justice to the Supreme Court mean that court all of a sudden will overturn the entire Constitution itself?

That doesn't make a lick of sense to me, nor does any of the other "she will violate the Constitution in order to do XYZ..." criticisms. She's a strict constitutionalist who sides with original intent and individual liberty. Why would her being one of 9 votes on the SCOTUS all of a sudden mean throwing away the Constitution?

She’s a Trump pawn, installed by Trump to keep Trump in power. The Party of Trump does not care about the constitution. They care about remaining in power. Barrett, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are puppets. They were appointed to do Trump’s bidding and ensure that he remains in office.

They have already decided that states can’t make their own rules about counting mail in ballots. 6 people will choose the next President and they will choose Trump.

[DorianRo]

Want to get those stimulus Checks? It will take months. Want to get those right wing judges in to start screwing the country up and taking everyone’s healthcare and workers rights away? Just a few days LOL true tyranny