Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think most people fully understand that Joe has good days and bad days, cognitively speaking.
But if you aren’t able to predict which day Joe will be able to function in advance, that means he can’t really do anything except the ceremonial part of the job.
So who would really be making the actual day to day decisions and running the country? I’m not certain it would be Harris, as the VP sometimes has conflicting duty and can’t always be at the White House getting briefed on a rapidly developing situation.
That leaves the White House Chief of Staff as the person who will likely be making a lot of the decisions? Or somebody else?
I hate Democrats for potentially making this nightmare scenario a reality.
I think most people fully understand that Joe has good days and bad days, cognitively speaking.
But if you aren’t able to predict which day Joe will be able to function in advance, that means he can’t really do anything except the ceremonial part of the job.
So who would really be making the actual day to day decisions and running the country? I’m not certain it would be Harris, as the VP sometimes has conflicting duty and can’t always be at the White House getting briefed on a rapidly developing situation.
That leaves the White House Chief of Staff as the person who will likely be making a lot of the decisions? Or somebody else?
I hate Democrats for potentially making this nightmare scenario a reality.
I used to think most of the shots would be called by Pelosi, but after listening to her speak lately, I'm not sure she's much better off mentally than Joe.
I think most people fully understand that Joe has good days and bad days, cognitively speaking.
But if you aren’t able to predict which day Joe will be able to function in advance, that means he can’t really do anything except the ceremonial part of the job.
So who would really be making the actual day to day decisions and running the country? I’m not certain it would be Harris, as the VP sometimes has conflicting duty and can’t always be at the White House getting briefed on a rapidly developing situation.
That leaves the White House Chief of Staff as the person who will likely be making a lot of the decisions? Or somebody else?
I hate Democrats for potentially making this nightmare scenario a reality.
China
Fortunately, Joe is toast, so it is a non-issue.
America should take in a deep breath and feel relieved that the US was almost ruled by China for four years.
She's exactly what they want, she's as corrupt and power hungry as a person can get and she'll follow the orders of her masters without question.
On top of that, she's inherently far left and authoritarian to start with, so there's no conflict between the orders of her masters and what she actually wants to do to the country.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
