Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Cancer is harmless for 96% of people. Might as well skip that colonoscopy.
Horrible analogy, but that's your thing. LIES. What is the mortality rate for various cancers? What is the mortality rate for Covid with those whom are not already old, sick and dying anyway? You lose, again.
Horrible analogy, but that's your thing. LIES. What is the mortality rate for various cancers? What is the mortality rate for Covid with those whom are not already old, sick and dying anyway? You lose, again.
Yeah, people have a mortality rate of 100%. Why bother with healthcare? No point!
if you're not over 70 and you don't have multiple underlying health conditions, you're never going to die from covid - the odds are about the same odds as winning the lottery. Sure it's possible but it's incredibly unlikely
Why can't we admit this and allow the people who are healthy to live normal lives? Why are night clubs banned? Is there 80 year olds going to night clubs? Why is the entire population forced to suffer to protect 5% of people who can just self isolate?
I don't remember the last time 511 Tennesseans who are 60 years or younger played the lottery and won the big prize especially over the course of only 6-7 months.
And even then there is a high risk of Health defects.
considering Trump is trying to do away with pre-existing conditions, even going to court over it, many people will be thrown off their insurance because of that.
"considering Trump is trying to do away with pre-existing conditions" PROVE it.
The repubs voted FOR it from the 1st draft of OCare to every time a vote came up.
August 10, 2020
"Trump: order on pre-existing conditions a "double safety net' despite Obamacare law"
"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Monday an executive order requiring health insurance companies to cover patients with pre-existing conditions would emphasize Republican support for the practice even though it is already part of existing law.'
"Asked on Monday why he needed an executive order to mandate something that is already legally required, Trump said it would provide “a double safety net” and would “let people know that the Republicans are totally, strongly in favor of ... taking care of people with pre-existing conditions.”
No way!!!!! There are long term impacts of COVID, and many people will end up with breathing problems. From what I've heard (from the 2 people I know who got it), it wasn't "harmless." And they were both relatively "young" (early 40s). Both of them said they were had no energy and breathing problems (in addition to normal flu like symptoms) that lasted for about 1 month. I wouldn't consider that "harmless!!!!!!"
" There are long term impacts of COVID,","From what I've heard" ," that lasted for about 1 month". "2 people".
I know 2 people who had ZERO after effects.
Some people with the flu experience the same.
Trump got it and he just did 3 rallies in 1 day and then had the SC judge sworn in. NO after affects.
because that 5% cant actually self isolate like you claim? Or do you want some island we toss everyone onto once they turn 80?
Because its not just death, its surviving with long term damage?
Because we dont know for sure how many times you can get it?
Because every infection is a opportunity for it to mutate?
Because if we overwhelm our hospitals its probably not going to be quite as survivable for a lot of folks?
I dunno. Things like that.
Too many people in the world anyhow.........................
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.