Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Giuliani read off a few sworn affidavits, pointed out that the people who were there while fraud was happening and wrote them, signed their statements under penalty of perjury. And he said they have a hundred more like it, which they would be presenting in court soon.
Sidney Powell described more evidence they had about massive ballot dumps and changes, he reasons why it was credible evidence, said that she had much, much more, all backed up by witnesses, and that they would present it ALL in court.
Jenna Ellis pointed out that what they had said so far was just an "opening statement", with a general description of what they had discovered and the degree of massive fraud it showed. She then said that they had tons more evidence, all of which they would present in court.
Ellis then mentioned that the Democrats would probably respond to the press conference in two ways: (a) That the lawyers hadn't presented enough evidence to win in that morning's press conference, and (b) That they had talked too long.
And look. That's exactly what the liberals here are responding with.
She called it exactly right.
Those three lawyers and the rest of their team, have got the far-left fanatics by the balls, who are just starting to feel the squeeze. And listen to how shrill their voices are getting already!
Oh please. When this is proven in court, the "unity" crowd is going to lose their ish and go into the streets and destroy and attack more than they have in the past. At that point, there will be no more sitting back and allowing it to happen. We will all know exactly who are domestic enemies are in this country.
What if it's not proven in court? Giuliani already said the judges are going to be mad at them because the so called witnesses don't want to go on record. So what if there's never any proof, just leaky head Giuliani sweating on TV?
The country needs to hold Trump and his henchmen accountable. There need to be investigations into all of them for as long as it takes including Congressional hearings and DOJ prosecutions where applicable.
What if it's not proven in court? Giuliani already said the judges are going to be mad at them because the so called witnesses don't want to go on record. So what if there's never any proof, just leaky head Giuliani sweating on TV?
The country needs to hold Trump and his henchmen accountable. There need to be investigations into all of them for as long as it takes including Congressional hearings and DOJ prosecutions where applicable.
He presented evidence today and it is documented and publicly available.
Anyone saying there is no evidence of massive election fraud in this election by the Democrats is a complete liar.
I watched the first 10-15 minutes of Rudy's performance. What evidence did he present? None!
The crux of his argument is the same one that was dismissed in court yesterday. He says that 680,000 mail-in ballots were not inspected. How does he know they were not inspected? He didn't say. The PA secretary of state has said that both parties had access for observers during the processing of ballots.
I worked at the polls this year, so I know that those votes would not have been counted until after checked against the list of registered voters. So the only way fraud could happen is if someone mailed in a ballot using a name of a registered voter who did not vote in person.
For the sake of argument, let's say he is right, and those 680,000 ballots were not properly inspected (primarily inspected for proper signature and valid address) before they were counted. What would Rudy have the court do? Disenfranchise 680,000 legitimate voters because one or two may have slipped in an improper ballot?
Oh please. When this is proven in court, the "unity" crowd is going to lose their ish and go into the streets and destroy and attack more than they have in the past. At that point, there will be no more sitting back and allowing it to happen. We will all know exactly who our domestic enemies are in this country.
If anyone has the audacity to be against the truth of massive fraud, they are not on our side.
Your wild fantasies and speculation are clearly driving you all out of your minds. I guess fact free conspiracy theories that can't be proven are making people more unhinged and encouraging this is the height of irresponsibility. Not to mention now you and others are just making threats to Americans because you don't like the outcome. Hopefully someone will be alerting the FBI or NSA. This is scary stuff.
Giuliani already said the judges are going to be mad at them because the so called witnesses don't want to go on record.
Naturally Giuliani said no such thing. He said that the witnesses didn't want their names publicly release in press conferences like this one, because they knew the Democrats would go after them, harass them, smear them, threaten them and their families etc., exactly as has already happened to many witnesses and even lawyers on the legal team.
Giuliani can, and will explain to the judge(s) about that, and hand them all the sworn affidavits, testimony etc., with the names of the witnesses clearly present, and ask the judges to protect those witnesses from the hate and violence of the Democrats... and the judges will.
Giuliani read off a few sworn affidavits, pointed out that the people who were there while fraud was happening and wrote them, signed their statements under penalty of perjury. And he said they have a hundred more like it, which they would be presenting in court soon.
Sidney Powell described more evidence they had about massive ballot dumps and changes, he reasons why it was credible evidence, said that she had much, much more, all backed up by witnesses, and that they would present it ALL in court.
Jenna Ellis pointed out that what they had said so far was just an "opening statement", with a general description of what they had discovered and the degree of massive fraud it showed. She then said that they had tons more evidence, all of which they would present in court.
Ellis then mentioned that the Democrats would probably respond to the press conference in two ways: (a) That the lawyers hadn't presented enough evidence to win in that morning's press conference, and (b) That they had talked too long.
And look. That's exactly what the liberals here are responding with.
She called it exactly right.
Those three lawyers and the rest of their team, have got the far-left fanatics by the balls, who are just starting to feel the squeeze. And listen to how shrill their voices are getting already!
Your wild fantasies and speculation are clearly driving you all out of your minds. I guess fact free conspiracy theories that can't be proven are making people more unhinged and encouraging this is the height of irresponsibility. Not to mention now you and others are just making threats to Americans because you don't like the outcome. Hopefully someone will be alerting the FBI or NSA. This is scary stuff.
LOL. Keep pretending that the msm is telling you the truth.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
