Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Preponderance of the evidence is really all that's needed to get certain ballots or even the entire election thrown out, which means it then goes to the state legislatures.
Definition:
The preponderance of the evidence evidentiary standard is the evidentiary standard required to be proven in civil law cases. This is a lower standard than the beyond a reasonable doubt standard, which will be discussed below.
What preponderance of the evidence means is that the burden of proof is met if there is greater than a 50% chance that, based on all the reasonable evidence shown, plaintiff’s claims are true and defendant did in fact do the wrong that caused the damage.
Many legal scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51% of the evidence shown favors the plaintiff’s story and outcome. Another way to think of the standard is to simply ask whether the plaintiff’s proposition is more likely to be true than not true.
The plaintiff meets this burden of proof by presenting physical and testimonial evidence to prove their case and the proposition that it is more likely to be true than not true that defendant caused the harm. On the other hand, the defendant does not have to do anything to prove or defend their case if the plaintiff fails to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. If the plaintiff does not meet this burden, then the defendant wins as a result.
"Its mission is to train Initial Entry Trainees for the MOSes of 35G (Geospatial Imagery Intelligence Analyst) and 35F (All Source Intelligence Analyst)."
It's mission is to TRAIN. Work on that reading comprehension.
Clinton campaign contractor caught in voter-fraud video sting is a felon who visited the White House 342 times – including a meeting in the OVAL OFFICE – but Obama's spokesman won't defend him
A convicted felon caught up in a pair of stinging political exposés has visited the Obama White House 342 times, according to the administration's records, including several visits to the Obama family's residence and one, in October of last year, to the Oval Office. Robert Creamer was caught on one hidden-camera video discussing ways to commit large-scale voter fraud, and talking in another about paying liberal activists to start fights and otherwise disrupt Donald Trump rallies. Democracy Partners, the community organizing firm that until Tuesday employed Creamer, works hand-in-hand with Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
Preponderance of the evidence is really all that's needed to get certain ballots or even the entire election thrown out, which means it then goes to the state legislatures.
Definition:
The preponderance of the evidence evidentiary standard is the evidentiary standard required to be proven in civil law cases. This is a lower standard than the beyond a reasonable doubt standard, which will be discussed below.
What preponderance of the evidence means is that the burden of proof is met if there is greater than a 50% chance that, based on all the reasonable evidence shown, plaintiff’s claims are true and defendant did in fact do the wrong that caused the damage.
Many legal scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51% of the evidence shown favors the plaintiff’s story and outcome. Another way to think of the standard is to simply ask whether the plaintiff’s proposition is more likely to be true than not true.
The plaintiff meets this burden of proof by presenting physical and testimonial evidence to prove their case and the proposition that it is more likely to be true than not true that defendant caused the harm. On the other hand, the defendant does not have to do anything to prove or defend their case if the plaintiff fails to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. If the plaintiff does not meet this burden, then the defendant wins as a result.
The PA SUPREME COURT dismisses the case argued by the Trump team that said mail in ballots were unconstitutional. Case dismissed
Mail in ballots are not unconstitutional.
Chief Justice Thomas Saylor issued a separate opinion agreeing to reverse the preliminary injunction. However, Saylor said he believes the Republican petitioners should still be able to argue their case about the constitutional validity of Act 77.
“I find that the relevant substantive challenge raised by Appellees presents troublesome questions about the constitutional validity of the new mail-in voting scheme,” Saylor wrote.
. . .he disagreed that the entire case should be tossed and also believed the broader matter “presents troublesome questions about the constitutional validity of the new mail-in voting scheme.”
Chief Justice Thomas Saylor issued a separate opinion agreeing to reverse the preliminary injunction. However, Saylor said he believes the Republican petitioners should still be able to argue their case about the constitutional validity of Act 77.
“I find that the relevant substantive challenge raised by Appellees presents troublesome questions about the constitutional validity of the new mail-in voting scheme,” Saylor wrote.
. . .he disagreed that the entire case should be tossed and also believed the broader matter “presents troublesome questions about the constitutional validity of the new mail-in voting scheme.”
No this isn't going to SCOTUS nor can it. This was a case for the state to decide as it was brought in state courts stating that it went against the State Constitution. The State Supreme Court UNAMIOUSLY rejected the case.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This may go to the SCOTUS
