Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Step 8 Under first name enter Kristin under last name enter Cercone date of birth is 11/17/1894 finally county should be selected as PHILADELPHIA
Step 9 click submit
If you did this correctly you should get a response that your ballot application was received on 10/7/2020 and processed the same day. Your ballot was mailed on 10/10/2020 and received on 10/30/2020. Your status is On Line Mail In Verified and your vote has been recorded.
Step 10 Open new tab and google search oldest living American
Step 12 Note the oldest living American is Hester Ford (born in Lancaster, South Carolina, August 15, 1905), aged 115 years, 87 days.
Step 13 Assuming Kristin is older than the oldest living American, we can presume she may be dead or she is older than the oldest person in modern history. It is unlikely 126 year old Kirstin has been living and voting in Philadelphia, yet according to election records she has. This is an example of ghost or zombie voting. I wonder, who did she vote for, can a CNN reporter arrange an interview? Will Politifact correct us and tell us being dead doesn't deprive us of our citizenship or right to vote?
BS degree in 2008. Average age of a person graduating with a BS degree is 24.
2008 - 24 = 1984
Birth date typed by data worker 1894. Think about what happened here.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
So your excuse is that software used in a Presidential election is so crappy it doesn't send an alert when a date is entered that makes this voter older than the oldest person living in the United States?
There is a way to start. Kirstin turns out to be a bit young for an old Pennsylvania voter. We need to go back to those who are over 220 years old to get to the oldest who voted.
Here is a a list, directly from Pennsylvania, click on date of birth at the top to go from oldest first. January 1, 1800 is popular. Each of these voters registered by mail or online. Someone 220 years old using Internet must be very smart.
Fill in the blanks with "1984"-- no such person sent in a ballot....Now the question is, if KC is real & young and a data entry mistake was made, then she should be contacted to see if she did indeed vote by mail...or did she vote in person AND a mail-in ballot was also cast?
"Kristin" would have been a very unusual name in the late 19th century, making the data entry mistake explanation likely.
Being from Chicago, I know a few tricks. You chose dead people to vote who have died recently. I'm pretty sure Osama bin Laden voted Dem in Cook County last week. Maybe in Philly too.
Fill in the blanks with "1984"-- no such person sent in a ballot....Now the question is, if KC is real & young and a data entry mistake was made, then she should be contacted to see if she did indeed vote by mail...or did she vote in person AND a mail-in ballot was also cast?
"Kristin" would have been a very unusual name in the late 19th century, making the data entry mistake explanation likely.
Being from Chicago, I know a few tricks. You chose dead people to vote who have died recently. I'm pretty sure Osama bin Laden voted Dem in Cook County last week. Maybe in Philly too.
Chicago of the 20th century used to be the vote early and often city. The 21st century seems to be the bring out your dead vote, nobody is too dead or too old to vote. Remember every vote counts. This may inspire a reboot of Tales from the Crypt.
So your excuse is that software used in a Presidential election is so crappy it doesn't send an alert when a date is entered that makes this voter older than the oldest person living in the United States?
My guess is that there are no date limitations in any software (Red or Blue state). At the end of the day a transcription error is a transcription error.
But honestly what raised the red flag initially was the name "Kristin" being associated with 1894.
At the end of the day if you want to believe that the facts are "purely coincidence" then that's your right. The court, however, will recognize it for what it is - human error.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
