Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't think I've ever seen a president who did not win refuse to concede - so you're right, usually the loser errs on the side of graciousness and concedes.
And then following that, the winner declares victory.
Do you expect Biden to never have an acceptance speech - because it's likely Trump will never concede?
Strange times call for strange measures.
Hillary keeps withdrawing her concession and saying the Russians stole it.
Like what? I have yet to say specifically "we think x, y, and z are illegal". Not even trying to be funny, I honestly don't know what they think is illegal.
We know they disagree with PA's law, but they are authorized by the US Constitution to set the rules and SCOTUS won't set precedence on this matter.
And your second point is correct. Even according to Attorney General William Barr - the illegal acts must be enough to swing the election.
There have been tons of articles. Just not on the Democratic controlled media-ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC/WaPo/NYT.
If you are honestly asking and not just spouting the party line:
Trump can file all the lawsuits he wants, unless he comes up with some evidence it's going nowhere.
Trump had his day in court, several of them as a matter fact. Sooner or later he's going to get hit with fines and sanctions for filing frivolous lawsuits unless he comes up with some evidence of some sort.
Well, I am not afraid at all. Thirty (30) former Democratic Lawmakers tell Biden to pack it in. Too much evidence is coming out. Jill Biden tells husband he should bow out. Liberals-- this us true really. "Sources" swear on it.
Also, none of this evidence of illegality covers all the efforts to make the ballot less secure.
Mail in ballots accepted after the election with no postmark?
Drive in ballot harvesting with no ID check?
Mail in ballots with no witnessing?
Massive mailing out of mail in ballots with no purging of the voter roles?
FYI, for those who didn't pay attention in government class or who don't live around here, when you go to court in the United States you need to bring and present evidence to support your case.
My understanding is that in some countries, Russia comes to mind, the court will supply the evidence against you. Here, you have to bring your own.
trump can file all the lawsuits he wants, unless he comes up with some evidence it's going nowhere.
Trump had his day in court, several of them as a matter fact. Sooner or later he's going to get hit with fines and sanctions for filing frivolous lawsuits unless he comes up with some evidence of some sort.
I do have to question why so many people are against and freaking out over simply having a full and open investigation ...
you've asked this question before and seem not to want to accept the answer:
if there is evidence of fraud then i support an investigation following the legal process set forth in that state. i do not support frivolous investigations or lawsuits
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.