Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:02 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,413,299 times
Reputation: 55562

Advertisements

They are an important state in the election
The lack of cooperation by the governor is suspicious
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:02 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,180,466 times
Reputation: 23891
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
You are aware that stopping the count will not change the outcome, correct?

As of yesterday morning, Biden had a 51K lead.
It did on the night of Nov 3rd...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:02 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,411,792 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Maybe you should research this more. Heres a good paper on this covering that no, they dont.

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236348571.pdf
Such rulings come down all the time. Saying they don't is simply to deny reality.

It's like saying judicial review doesn't exist because Marbury v Madison was wrongly decided.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:04 PM
 
13,284 posts, read 8,452,873 times
Reputation: 31512
Quote:
Originally Posted by corpgypsy View Post
The GOP wanted the ID done by the 9th and Pennsylvania said the 12th.





https://www.post-gazette.com/news/cr...s/202011120132

Joe Biden 290

Donald Trump 217
Post#27 , sorry didn't capture the entire portion. Please refer back to it.

This is the factual answer to the specific case. Thank you for explaining to the massly misinformed.

It's about the ballots that had to be cured for signature or other features on the ballot. It is NOT about the entire mail.in ballots. Gosh darn how incredibly slow of mind does a person have to be to miss the entire briefing and posting above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:04 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,439,510 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Exactly no evidence of such, you're still falling for Trump's projected delusions of personal grievance.

Trump actually did slightly better this time in Philly county compared to 2016, Biden got 81% this time, Clinton got 82% in 2016.

His loss in PA was mostly due to doing slightly worse in nearly all the rural red counties this time.
You assume so much baseless stuff.

I already said they will likely not be able to find the evidence. Only if someone fesses up or info comes from the post office that they delivered more.

My belief has nothing to do with Trump.

It has to to with PA history especially Philly. It also has to do with my own professional experience.

Are you old enough to remember when the majority of Americans mailed their tax return on paper to IRS? Lines used to snake around the post office many of which stayed open till midnight with Americans who waited till the last minute to get their returns postmarked 4/15. People had parties in line, etc.

Ever been near an IRS mail room the week after 4/15 when even now tractor trailers full of mail post marked 4/15 roll in for days up to a week.

Sorry, that 10,000 count by PA screams fraud or incompetence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,411,792 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
You assume so much baseless stuff.
I didn't assume anything.

If you are not immune to facts, look at the county by county results in PA for 2016 compared to 2020, in one rural red county after another you will see Trump doing worse this time.

Is your argument that all of these GOP areas cheated to hurt Trump?

The reason Trump lost is obvious, even if you don't want to see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:08 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,532,093 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
So you think Trump is going to win dozens of such cases throwing out a handful of votes here and there and that will result in adding up to the state flipping?
That is what they are hoping.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:09 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,368,360 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Such rulings come down all the time. Saying they don't is simply to deny reality.

It's like saying judicial review doesn't exist because Marbury v Madison was wrongly decided.
Go read the linked paper, it includes examples in the past about this with specific case citations if you feel the need to pull them up, and how the vast majority of the time the argument is a loser. Courts do not get to legislate from the bench. This so far has been the only case I saw that had a chance of being successful so far. And...its a big nothing to be honest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:09 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,532,093 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
Anyone who believes that PA has only 10,000 of these segregated ballots must be seeing a lot of pigs flying around where they live.

PA voters cast over 6.8 million votes it defies common sense that when told they could do so only 10,000 people waited to mail their ballots on election day.
Many people use the dropbox also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2020, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,205,611 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Nope, courts have just as much authority to rule on election deadline related laws as any other laws and do so all the time.

This argument went to SCOTUS before the election and the change was allowed to stand.
Since it was allowed to stand the voter were acting in good faith in sending in their ballots. Why would a judge punish those voters that were acting in good faith?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top