Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Constitution is clear each state sets the time, manner and process for voting.
What you or I think it a better way has no merit.
Don’t like it? Amend the Constitution. All it takes is a super majority in Congress and then a super majority of states to ratify it. POTUS does not get a vote.
If these looser voting rules are that popular, it shouldn't be difficult to get the approval of 2/3 of Congress and 3/4 of the states. Right?
I am not sure what Roboteer was thinking about, but here is the problem with an entire mail-out election. The "system" loses control of the ballot. Once that ballot is out, it is up for grabs. It isn't inconceivable that a political operative could go to an apartment complex the day mail-out ballots arrive (the mailing date is public record) and buy the ballots for $20 a piece; ask the person to sign the envelope and given them their $20 bill.
The things you guys dream up is just so crazy. There were over 150 million votes cast in the last presidential election. You think you can pay people 20 dollars a ballot and make an impact on the election? First of all the cost would be astronomical and you would need tens of thousands of people not to talk about getting paid money to sell their ballot. You honestly think something like this would be feasible?
Looks like the usual suspects are whining and complaining once again, about states passing laws designed to make it harder for them to cheat in elections, and/or for any unqualified voter to cast ballot(s).
It's a good time to review some of the suggestions made in this thread.
Why bother even voting if the fraud is allowed to stand. The left will just change the results to their favor.
Once again, if vote fraud has been going on, then just why the hell aren't Republicans filing criminal vote fraud charges against the perpetrators and getting them sent to prison?
Only in-person ballots should be accepted. No mail-in, no absentee. I understand the argument for military personnel, so I'd hear that out to an extent, but only die-hard voters who show up at the polls should count.
If Republicans and Democrats think in states that have mail in voting is going fine, then why change it to make it stricter or abolish it?
Looks like the usual suspects are whining and complaining once again, about states passing laws designed to make it harder for them to cheat in elections, and/or for any unqualified voter to cast ballot(s).
Once again, if vote fraud has been going on, then just why the hell aren't Republicans filing criminal vote fraud charges against the perpetrators and getting them sent to prison?
Mail-in voting was so successful and free of problems this time, by the next presidential election, all the states will probably be using it exclusively, as they have in Oregon for several election cycles.
LOL, Dream on, Republicans won't allow unless maybe there is another pandemic going on in 2024. Perish the thought!
Of course there was fraud. There is ALWAYS fraud. The question is was it so much worse this year that it had a significant result on the election.
At the minimum, it will be revealed that Dominion System should be disallowed in the future, as it has been used to switch votes In corrupt countries like Venezuela. (Even Warren and Kloubacher questioned their reliability.) Also, going forward, there will be a relief shift at the ready so that the counting doesn’t stop mid-stream. This excuse that the counters were tired is pretty transparent.
Once again, if there is always vote fraud, then just why the hell aren't Republicans, or anybody else who is in a legal position to do so getting vote fraud charged as crime and perpetrators of it sent to prison? After all, it is a serious felony crime, isn't it?
It’s fine how it is. Get out of your echo chambers.
Right. Just who has been denied the right to vote because someone forged their signature on the voter rolls? If that situation is widespread in some state or locality, I can see requiring an ID, but don't see it as a serious problem. I voted for decades by just telling the poll worker my name and signing it, and never had a problem with it.
Once again, if there is always vote fraud, then just why the hell aren't Republicans, or anybody else who is in a legal position to do so getting vote fraud charged as crime and perpetrators of it sent to prison? After all, it is a serious felony crime, isn't it?
As usual, the cheating Democrats are trying frantically to change the subject to "prove there were examples of cheating in 2020"....
.... instead of the subject of the thread, "How should the next election be held, in light of the plentiful evidence that electronic voting machines can be spoofed and laws changed to make it ridiculously easy to cheat".
They are terrified of discussing the real thread subject, and so are doing everything they can to pretend it isn't there.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
