Official: DOJ Will Continue to Pursue All Specific and Credible Allegations of 2020 Election Fraud (attorney, Pennsylvania)

[Grlzrl]

Official: DOJ Will Continue to Pursue All Specific and Credible Allegations of 2020 Election Fraud

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elect...lection-fraud/

A Department of Justice official said the DOJ will continue to pursue allegations of fraud related to the 2020 election, after the Associated Press (AP) reported that Attorney General Bill Barr had not found any evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the election....

[Mathguy]

I fully expect them to do that, it's their job.

Now if only someone would supply them with a specific and credible allegation.

One that could stand up in a real court of law....it's been weeks and zip. zilch. nada.

P.S. For the benefit of our special posters, that was not politically neutral.

[ClaraC]

Well, OF COURSE they will.

Barr has said there's no credible evidence he's seen, but it's his JOB to pursue evidence if it were to arise in the future.

[michiganmoon]

I don't think they will do any serious digging, but I wouldn't expect the outcome to change anyways.

Why would I expect a serious investigation when we've had years of privileged people getting off, subpoenaed things destroyed, etc. There are laws for the elites and laws for us plebes.

[Hightower72]

Originally Posted by ClaraC

Well, OF COURSE they will.

Barr has said there's no credible evidence he's seen, but it's his JOB to pursue evidence if it were to arise in the future.

If this is obvious, why would the DOJ feel the need to correct the narrative?

"Some media outlets have incorrectly reported that the Department has concluded its investigation of election fraud and announced an affirmative finding of no fraud in the election. That is not what the Associated Press reported nor what the Attorney General stated. The Department will continue to receive and vigorously pursue all specific and credible allegations of fraud as expeditiously as possible."

There's a world of difference between an ongoing investigation, and a declaration that is fanfared to the public as if it's conclusive.

Clearly they felt they were being misrepresented by your reliable news sources.

[bu2]

Originally Posted by Mathguy

I fully expect them to do that, it's their job.

Now if only someone would supply them with a specific and credible allegation.

One that could stand up in a real court of law....it's been weeks and zip. zilch. nada.

P.S. For the benefit of our special posters, that was not politically neutral.

How about the woman who did ballot harvesting with 143 nursing home ballots in Texas? The man who voted for his dead mother in Pennsylvania?

There have been others. You just stick your head in the sand.

[moneill]

Of course they will. But it is clear that there has been no significant evidence as of yet.

[greywar]

Of course they will....the issue is that there isnt any widescale fraud. The best folks come up with is nonsense about individuals attempting it-and often getting caught. None of which would change the election. I think we've seen more Republican stupidity there then Democrats.

[moneill]

Originally Posted by bu2

How about the woman who did ballot harvesting with 143 nursing home ballots in Texas? The man who voted for his dead mother in Pennsylvania?

There have been others. You just stick your head in the sand.

There are nominal issues every election. But there is no significant evidence of widespread fraud.

Each election millions of ballots are cast, and there are instances of some voter fraud. They are NEVER EVER significant.

[cuebald]

Originally Posted by bu2

How about the woman who did ballot harvesting with 143 nursing home ballots in Texas? The man who voted for his dead mother in Pennsylvania?

There have been others. You just stick your head in the sand.

How about the fake ballot collection boxes the republicans put out in California? How many ballots did they destroy?