Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea
Yes, indeed. In addition to being hypocrites, many people seem unable to understand the distinction between Jews and Israelis.
Criticizing Israel does not rise to the level of condemnation of all Jews the world over any more than criticizing Austria amounts to a condemnation of all Germans the world over.
|
It's a distinction a little too fine for my taste. It seems that people will go to the streets for "self-determination" for just about every people. The Jews are an exception. When they try to stand up for their rights, whether in Israel or elsewhere, they are assailed. Even, as I point out below, Jews have a tendency to question tactics that are needed for survival.
I recently read
Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel's Targeted Assassinations by
Ronen Bergman. He is not an uncritical supporter of Israel.
Ronen Bergman, the author, appears to have questions about the need of enlightened, civilized countries to kill terrorists outside the theater of combat. I see nothing wrong with that. There is no moral grace in allowing "asymetical warfare" or terror to continue. If countries and peoples want peace, the default mode of modern, civilized countries is willfully grant it, sometimes even bending over backwards to do so. Witness the Abrahamic Accords between Israel and the UAE and Bahrain, the SALT I treaty, the "Iran Deal", known as the JCPOA and the Paris Peace Accords involving the Vietnam War in 1973. The West generally wants peace. It is the rare case that the West is goaded into devastating responses, such as outlined in the book above, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Dresden, Sherman's Civil War March to the Sea and similar responses.